The 10 best software solutions to comply with TCFD
Let’s talk about climate disclosure: the role of TCFD
How TCFD/ISSB software helps meet obligations
5 Benefits of implementing software for TCFD
Turning TCFD into a competitive advantage for your company
Dcycle: the ESG solution for every use case
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
These are the 10 best software solutions to comply with TCFD in 2025
Having software to comply with TCFD has become essential for any company that wants to anticipate market demands and demonstrate real management of climate risks and opportunities.
The recommendations of this framework have become a global reference in financial and climate disclosure, so having tools that allow integrating ESG information consistently is no longer an option but a necessity.
The goal is not only to comply with a regulation but to understand how climate affects business and how to incorporate that information into corporate strategy.
Organizations that achieve this with solid and traceable data are in a much more competitive position, both in front of investors and their own clients and teams.
In the following sections, we will explain what complying with TCFD involves, how to structure the information according to its four main pillars, and what type of digital solutions make its practical application easier within ESG reporting and management processes.
Dcycle is a leading ESG management platform that allows companies to collect, organize, and report all sustainability and climate information in one place.
We are not auditors or consultants, but a technological solution for companies that want to automate their data management and comply with frameworks such as TCFD, CSRD, EU Taxonomy, or ISO standards without manual processes or external dependencies.
Our proposal focuses on a key point: ESG information is scattered across multiple systems, and if we do not connect it, we lose traceability and decision-making capacity.
That is why Dcycle unifies and distributes ESG data across all relevant use cases, eliminating duplication and simplifying the preparation of regulatory and strategic reports.
The platform is designed to adapt to any company and sector, allowing customization of indicators, importing data from different sources, and generating audit-ready reports.
In addition, it automates the calculation of GHG emissions and links them to the four pillars of the TCFD framework: governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.
With Dcycle, compliance stops being an isolated task and becomes a strategic business lever. Measuring, managing, and communicating ESG data accurately is no longer just an obligation but a competitive advantage in a market that demands transparency and verifiable data.
Main advantages:
Persefoni has become one of the most comprehensive platforms for carbon management and climate reporting.
Its approach is designed for companies that want to deepen the financial analysis of climate risk, complying with the principles of the TCFD framework and the emerging ISSB standards.
It allows the integration of emission, operations, and value chain data to generate structured reports under the four TCFD pillars, as well as enabling climate scenario simulations and transition models.
Main advantages:
Watershed focuses on providing an operational view of climate risk, with tools that connect emissions measurement, reduction project management, and report preparation under TCFD, CSRD, or SBTi.
Its main value lies in automating data tracking and transforming dispersed metrics into actionable information for management and sustainability teams.
Main advantages:
Workiva stands out for its ability to unify financial and sustainability reporting in a single workflow, making it a valuable tool for finance, compliance, and ESG teams working in an integrated way.
It offers templates adapted to the TCFD framework, as well as collaboration tools, data validation, and auditing features that significantly reduce manual effort and consolidation errors.
Main advantages:
Greenly offers an agile and continuous approach to measuring environmental and climate impact, especially useful for companies taking their first steps in TCFD or structured climate reporting.
Its intuitive interface allows collecting data on emissions, energy, and supply chain, generating reports aligned with governance, strategy, and metrics requirements of the TCFD framework.
Main advantages:
Futureproof is software focused on facilitating the rapid adoption of ESG frameworks, including TCFD, CSRD, and SBTi, without the need for large technical resources.
Its proposal is aimed at teams that want to structure climate and sustainability information clearly and efficiently, without complications or complex integrations.
The platform enables users to record, normalize, and analyze ESG data to generate reports consistent with the four TCFD pillars.
Its alert systems and dashboards help identify risks and opportunities, offering a comprehensive view of business performance and resilience.
Main advantages:
StepChange combines carbon management with decarbonization planning, offering guided workflows to measure, plan, and report under TCFD or CSRD.
It is designed for organizations that want to integrate sustainability into their business strategy, not just as a one-time report.
Its step-by-step interface guides users through the requirements of governance, strategy, risks, and metrics, ensuring consistency and accuracy in published information.
Main advantages:
Emitwise specializes in Scope 3 measurement and management, offering detailed coverage of the supply chain and its connection with TCFD requirements.
It is particularly useful for companies with complex operations or those highly dependent on global suppliers.
Its data model links indirect impacts to the company’s climate risk strategy, facilitating structured analysis and reporting aligned with the four TCFD pillars.
Main advantages:
Normative is aimed at the financial sector and companies that need to align climate reporting with regulatory frameworks and sustainable investment standards.
Its system allows quantifying climate risk from a financial perspective, integrating TCFD principles and the ISSB S2 standard.
It stands out for its methodological precision and its ability to consolidate data from multiple sources, offering reports ready for external audits.
Main advantages:
VelocityEHS Accelerate ESG offers a comprehensive suite for environmental, health, and governance management, with specific modules for climate risks, ESG metrics, and TCFD reporting.
Its proposal is designed for companies that already handle regulatory compliance and want to integrate the climate dimension into their ESG management.
It connects operational information, environmental indicators, and governance policies to build coherent and verifiable ESG reporting, aligned with international standards.
Main advantages:
The TCFD framework (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) was created with a clear goal: to help companies understand and communicate how climate risks and opportunities affect their strategy and financial performance.
Its purpose is not to impose a new rule but to establish a common and comparable structure so that investors, regulators, and organizations themselves can interpret climate information consistently.
In practice, TCFD is based on four key pillars: governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.
These pillars structure the entire process of analysis and disclosure—from how climate risk decisions are made to how results are measured and reported.
Applying this framework is not only about regulatory compliance. It’s about integrating climate risk management into strategic decision-making, enabling companies to anticipate, allocate resources correctly, and demonstrate to stakeholders that actions are backed by reliable and verifiable data.
In 2023, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) considered the mission of the TCFD completed and transferred its follow-up to the IFRS Foundation, which now leads the development of global sustainability standards under the ISSB (International Sustainability Standards Board).
In 2024, IFRS S2 was introduced as the natural evolution of the TCFD framework, incorporating all its principles and expanding its scope to improve comparability across companies and countries.
Alongside it, IFRS S1 sets the general foundation for sustainability disclosure, while S2 specifically focuses on climate-related risks and opportunities.
This means that the TCFD framework remains fully relevant, but is now integrated into a broader international standard aligned with financial markets.
For companies, this represents a clear opportunity: to unify the way they measure, manage, and communicate ESG information across all regulatory and financial frameworks.
The TCFD framework has become a global reference, and in some countries, it is already mandatory for certain companies or sectors.
In the United Kingdom, for example, listed entities must publish a report aligned with TCFD or explain why they do not. The financial regulator actively monitors the quality and consistency of those disclosures.
In New Zealand, financial institutions have been required to report under TCFD since fiscal year 2023.
In Australia, a climate disclosure system is being implemented based directly on ISSB standards, which themselves consolidate the TCFD principles.
In the United States, although the SEC rule approved in 2024 is currently on judicial hold, most large corporations continue using TCFD as a de facto guide.
This proves that, beyond legal enforcement, the framework has become a common language for communicating climate risks and opportunities worldwide.
In short, TCFD is the foundation upon which new international standards are built.
That’s why more and more companies are adapting their internal processes to collect ESG data, integrate it into their systems, and prepare to comply simultaneously with TCFD, ISSB, and CSRD, reducing effort and gaining coherence in their reporting.
The TCFD framework and the CSRD are closely aligned in purpose: ensuring that climate risk management becomes part of corporate strategy, not an isolated report.
Both share the idea that companies must understand how climate-related risks and opportunities affect their operations—and at the same time, how their activity contributes to those impacts.
The European ESRS standards, particularly E1 (climate change), further develop the TCFD recommendations, keeping the same structure of four pillars: governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.
The main difference is that ESRS adds greater granularity, traceability, and mandatory digital format (XBRL), raising the level of transparency and comparability.
Companies can also leverage their EINF reports to ensure consistency between non-financial and climate disclosures.
We can say that TCFD defines the conceptual framework, while ESRS defines the technical requirements and reporting format.
Companies that already report under TCFD therefore have a solid foundation for adapting to CSRD, since the key elements remain: climate risk management, scenario analysis, reduction targets, and results disclosure.
A TCFD-aligned report must show how the company manages climate risks and opportunities at all levels.
It is not a theoretical exercise, but a way to connect business strategy with the real impact of climate change on the organization.
The four pillars are the same ones that structure the most advanced sustainability and financial reporting frameworks.
The first pillar analyzes how climate risk is supervised within the company’s governance structure.
TCFD requires companies to describe the roles of the board, management, and specific committees, as well as the mechanisms used to integrate climate issues into strategic decision-making.
The goal is to demonstrate that climate risk is part of internal control and corporate governance, supported by a clear structure to review, update, and measure progress with verifiable data.
The second pillar focuses on explaining how climate risks and opportunities influence the company’s strategy, planning, and business model.
Companies are expected to use climate scenario analysis to represent different possible futures, considering regulatory, technological, and environmental variables.
These scenarios should illustrate how profitability, resilience, or the value chain could be affected in the short, medium, and long term.
This analysis helps evaluate the resilience of the business model and the effectiveness of the actions taken in response to climate risks.
This pillar details how the company identifies, evaluates, and manages climate risks, including both transition risks (related to regulation, technologies, and market changes) and physical risks (linked to extreme events, infrastructure, or resource availability).
The key is to demonstrate that climate risk is not managed in isolation, but as part of the overall enterprise risk management (ERM) system.
The report should describe the processes, responsibilities, review frequency, and control mechanisms used to monitor and mitigate these risks.
The fourth pillar focuses on the metrics and targets the company uses to measure its climate performance.
This includes calculating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under Scopes 1, 2, and 3, along with intensity indicators (per revenue, production, or area) and reduction goals within defined time frames.
Companies are also expected to disclose how these indicators are reviewed, updated, and integrated into corporate strategy, including the methodologies used.
The consistency of these metrics is crucial for aligning TCFD information with ESRS E1 and ISSB S2, ensuring comparability and coherence across frameworks.
Together, these four pillars form the basis of a robust and verifiable climate management system, where measuring, analyzing, and reporting data becomes a competitive advantage rather than a mere regulatory task.
Complying with TCFD or ISSB frameworks requires much more than writing a report.
It involves managing complex data, ensuring traceability, and demonstrating consistency between strategy, risks, and results.
That’s why using specialized software makes the difference: it allows companies to automate tasks, centralize information, and ensure that each disclosure point is supported by verifiable evidence.
The first step to comply with TCFD or ISSB is to gather all climate-related information in one structured environment.
This includes GHG emissions, energy consumption, financial data, and supply chain information.
A specialized software platform enables importing data from various internal and external sources, applying automatic quality checks, and maintaining complete traceability from the original source to the final report.
This process reduces manual errors, ensures consistency, and makes it easier to demonstrate reliability during reviews or audits.
One of the key pillars of TCFD is the analysis of climate scenarios.
A good software tool makes it possible to create, compare, and update scenarios by incorporating variables such as carbon prices, future regulations, or physical and transition risks.
It also allows documenting all assumptions used, ensuring transparency and consistency between reporting cycles.
This is essential for making results comparable and showing that strategic analysis is based on real data rather than generic estimates.
Climate risk should not be managed separately from other business risks.
It must be integrated into the company’s overall risk management system (ERM) and internal control mechanisms.
A strong TCFD or ISSB software platform helps align climate data with corporate risk processes, assigning owners, review frequencies, and automatic alerts.
This ensures that transition and physical risks are assessed and prioritized alongside financial and operational risks, creating an integrated, auditable view of the company’s exposure.
One of the biggest benefits of using specialized software is the ability to generate interactive dashboards and digital reports in formats like XBRL or ISSB/ESRS-compatible templates.
This allows teams to visualize trends, detect deviations, and prepare information directly for public disclosure or audits.
By digitizing the entire process, companies ensure that data is up to date, easy to review, and ready for regulatory submission, reducing both time and human error.
The real value of TCFD/ISSB software lies in its ability to connect regulatory frameworks.
A well-designed system allows the same ESG data to be reused across TCFD, ESRS (CSRD), and even SEC requirements.
This avoids duplication of work, maintains consistency across reports, and increases efficiency throughout the reporting process.
The result is a centralized and scalable ESG data architecture, ready to respond to any regulatory or market requirement.
In short, a TCFD/ISSB software platform is not just a compliance tool—it is a strategic enabler that allows companies to manage climate risk with reliable, traceable, and standardized data, aligned with international standards.
Implementing a TCFD software solution is not only about compliance; it’s about professionalizing climate risk management within the company.
It connects strategy, operations, and reporting under a unified structure, eliminating silos and enabling faster, data-driven decisions.
Specialized software aligns strategic information with risks and performance indicators.
The entire flow—from risk identification to final publication—is connected, ensuring that what is reported truly reflects how the company manages climate risk in practice.
Consistency between financial, operational, and ESG data is key to demonstrating credibility to investors, auditors, and regulators.
This level of alignment is only achievable when all data is managed in a single structured environment.
With digital tools, manual processes disappear.
There is no longer a need to merge spreadsheets, compare versions, or depend on scattered files.
A TCFD software automates data collection and metric calculation, reducing error probability and freeing up time for analysis and planning.
This increases accuracy, speeds up report preparation, and improves data quality, which is essential for compliance with TCFD, ISSB, and CSRD requirements.
New regulations demand greater transparency and verification capability.
A TCFD software ensures complete traceability of every data point, storing sources, timestamps, and evidence, which simplifies external reviews and limited assurance audits under CSRD.
This traceability builds trust and shows that the company’s disclosures are based on verifiable and auditable data, not on estimates.
An updated platform guarantees compatibility with the ISSB S2 standard, the global evolution of TCFD.
It also allows quick adaptation to local or sector-specific requirements, such as CSRD in Europe or other supervisory guidelines.
This ensures that all published information is consistent, comparable, and usable in any jurisdiction or digital reporting format.
One of the greatest advantages of implementing a technological solution is the ability to reuse ESG data across different frameworks: TCFD, ESRS, CSRD, EU Taxonomy, or ISO standards.
By centralizing all ESG information, companies avoid duplicating work and maintain coherence between reports.
This turns climate reporting into a scalable and sustainable process, ready to evolve as regulations change.
Not all ESG management systems meet the specific needs of the TCFD framework.
To comply effectively and maintain a solid reporting structure, a good software platform must include features that ensure traceability, interoperability, and information control.
The system should allow users to create, compare, and update climate scenarios that include financial, regulatory, or operational variables.
It must also support sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of different assumptions on business performance and to visualize potential strategic pathways.
This function is critical for understanding how various climate trajectories could affect revenue, costs, or supply chain resilience, and for making informed business decisions.
A TCFD software must integrate seamlessly with internal company systems such as ERPs, spreadsheets, emission-tracking tools, or financial databases to automatically capture all relevant data.
This eliminates fragmentation and provides a unified view of climate and financial performance.
By connecting systems, the company ensures that information remains consistent and synchronized, regardless of where it originates.
The platform must enable version management, evidence storage, and internal audit tracking for each dataset.
This ensures that every figure in the report is backed by its original source and can be reviewed at any time.
It also helps maintain transparency and reliability, core principles of both TCFD and ISSB.
Proper data governance also allows assigning roles and responsibilities, maintaining logs of every modification, and establishing approval workflows before data publication.
Collaborative workflows are essential to coordinate data validation across departments.
A well-designed software system enables role assignment, approvals, and automated reviews, reducing the risk of error and ensuring that the final report passes through the proper internal validation layers.
This function supports segregation of duties and provides a controlled environment, especially valuable for listed companies and entities preparing for limited assurance audits.
The platform must offer export capabilities in multiple formats, such as XBRL, PDF, or official templates, while maintaining the pillar-by-pillar TCFD structure (governance, strategy, risk management, metrics, and targets).
This pillar-based traceability makes it easier to show compliance with each requirement and simplifies the work of auditors, reviewers, and regulatory teams.
In short, a robust TCFD software helps companies move from manual and fragmented management to a centralized, auditable, and internationally aligned model, ensuring confident and efficient compliance.
Complying with TCFD should not be viewed as a burden but as an opportunity to strengthen corporate strategy.
When companies measure and manage climate risks and opportunities using reliable data, they gain a real advantage in the market: anticipating challenges, reducing uncertainty, and making data-driven decisions.
Organizations that manage their ESG data through structured systems are better positioned to comply with TCFD, ISSB, and CSRD, while demonstrating to investors and clients that they operate with transparency and resilience.
Organizations that manage their Carbon Footprint and ESG data through structured systems are better positioned to comply with TCFD, ISSB, and CSRD, while demonstrating to investors and clients that they operate with transparency and resilience.
In this context, adopting a TCFD/ISSB software solution is not just a compliance measure—it’s a strategic step towards efficiency, credibility, and competitiveness.
Before digitalizing the process, it is crucial to understand your current position and design a clear roadmap.
Software alone will not solve the problem if data, processes, or responsibilities are not properly structured.
Preparing correctly ensures that the company can maximize the value of the tool and achieve consistent, reliable outcomes.
The first step is to assess the current level of compliance with the 11 TCFD recommendations.
This gap analysis helps identify what information is already available, what is missing, and which processes need to be strengthened.
A well-prepared gap analysis serves as a roadmap for action, helping to prioritize tasks, assign responsibilities, and set realistic deadlines for each department involved.
Climate scenario analysis is one of the most technical elements of the TCFD framework.
It is important to define a minimum set of scenarios and assumptions—for example, regulatory variables, carbon prices, or physical event risks—that can be updated periodically.
These scenarios must be based on verifiable data and serve as a foundation to simulate financial or strategic impacts, allowing companies to anticipate decisions and assess the resilience of their business model.
The next step is to integrate climate risk into the enterprise risk management (ERM) system.
This doesn’t mean creating a new process, but embedding climate risk into the same matrix used for financial, operational, and reputational risks.
This approach provides a comprehensive view of the company’s risk exposure, with defined owners, indicators, and automated monitoring mechanisms that keep the system up to date.
A TCFD/ISSB software only adds value if the data is reliable, consistent, and traceable.
Therefore, it is essential to define data quality controls, register data sources, and maintain a version history, ensuring that every figure in the report can be justified in case of review or audit.
Traceability is not just a technical requirement—it’s a sign of rigor and transparency that strengthens stakeholder trust and reduces the risk of errors in future verifications.
Finally, it’s important to align climate reporting with international standards.
The ISSB S2 framework builds on the TCFD principles and expands them, while ESRS E1 develops them in more detail for the European context.
By structuring data according to these standards from the beginning, companies can reuse the same information to comply simultaneously with TCFD, ISSB, and CSRD, avoiding duplication and ensuring reporting consistency.
Turning climate compliance into an automated and well-governed process not only simplifies operations but transforms ESG management into a strategic lever to compete, attract investment, and anticipate risks with a business-oriented perspective.
At Dcycle, we help companies centralize and automate ESG management within a single environment.
We are not auditors or consultants—we are a solution for businesses that want to move away from manual processes and adopt a structured, traceable data system ready to meet any framework or regulation.
Our approach is simple: we collect all ESG information from your organization and automatically distribute it across all relevant use cases, whether EINF, SBTi, CSRD, EU Taxonomy, or ISO standards.
This way, companies measure once and use the data multiple times, maintaining complete coherence and control across every report.
Instead of relying on spreadsheets and scattered sources, we unify environmental, social, and governance data in a single platform.
The system allows importing, cleaning, and normalizing information, ensuring consistency between departments such as finance, operations, and sustainability.
A robust platform also allows companies to integrate sustainable finance frameworks into their ESG and climate management systems, ensuring that sustainability data supports both regulatory compliance and investment decision-making.
The result is a structured data flow where each value is backed by evidence and can be reused for any report or regulatory process without starting from scratch.
With Dcycle, the international frameworks TCFD and ISSB are directly integrated with the European CSRD and ESRS standards, eliminating redundant work.
Our system translates the requirements of each framework into a common data model, ensuring interoperability and alignment of all ESG information.
This enables companies to prepare climate, financial, and ESG reports from a single environment while maintaining full consistency across all outputs.
We automate the measurement of key indicators (KPIs), the updating of climate scenarios, and the generation of digital reports compatible with formats such as XBRL or ISSB-ready templates.
This allows teams to spend less time on operations and more time analyzing results and planning strategy.
Each indicator updates automatically and can be visualized through dynamic dashboards, complete with filters and cross-year comparisons.
Traceability and verification are built into Dcycle’s core.
Every recorded value is linked to its source, date, and owner, making internal review and limited audits under CSRD straightforward.
The software also includes quality controls and approval workflows, ensuring that all published data has gone through a structured validation process before disclosure or submission.
Our goal is to transform climate reporting into a business intelligence tool.
It’s not only about compliance—it’s about turning ESG data into actionable insights for decision-making.
With centralized and up-to-date data, companies can identify risks, assess opportunities, and anticipate scenarios that impact profitability and positioning.
In essence, Dcycle integrates sustainability, compliance, and corporate strategy into one system, helping businesses measure, manage, and communicate their impact with the same precision and rigor as their financial performance.
The TCFD framework (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) was created to help companies identify, manage, and communicate climate-related risks and opportunities that can affect their business model and financial results.
Its structure is based on four fundamental pillars:
These four pillars ensure that climate information is clear, comparable, and decision-useful, enabling investors and stakeholders to evaluate how companies are addressing climate challenges.
The ISSB (International Sustainability Standards Board) took over from the TCFD in 2023, integrating its principles into the IFRS S2 standard.
This means TCFD remains the conceptual foundation, but it now evolves into a broader and globally harmonized framework.
IFRS S2 maintains the same structure as TCFD but adds more technical detail, stronger comparability requirements, and alignment with financial reporting.
Together with IFRS S1, which covers general sustainability disclosure, S2 specifically focuses on climate risks and opportunities.
In practice, companies already reporting under TCFD are well prepared to adopt IFRS S2, as both frameworks share consistent principles and complementary requirements.
The TCFD framework has become an international benchmark, and in many jurisdictions, it is mandatory or strongly encouraged.
This widespread adoption shows that TCFD has become the global language for climate disclosure, serving as the foundation for all subsequent standards, including ISSB, ESRS, and CSRD.
The key difference lies in detail and regulatory scope.
TCFD acts as a global reference framework, while ESRS E1 is a European standard under the CSRD, mandatory for companies operating in the EU.
Both share the same structure—governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets—but ESRS E1 introduces greater granularity, data traceability, and digital tagging (XBRL).
In short:
Therefore, any company already aligned with TCFD has a solid baseline to transition smoothly to CSRD and ESRS compliance.
A good TCFD or ISSB software should simplify the process of collecting, analyzing, and reporting climate data in a structured and verifiable way.
Key capabilities include:
Ultimately, such tools allow companies to automate reporting, reduce manual errors, and maintain consistency across international frameworks, turning climate disclosure into a streamlined and strategic process.
Because climate disclosure is inherently data-heavy and multidimensional.
Companies must handle information from operations, energy use, emissions, supply chain, and finances, all of which need to be traceable, auditable, and comparable.
Without a specialized platform, this process becomes manual, fragmented, and prone to errors.
Software designed for TCFD and ISSB provides automation, version control, and centralized workflows—key for ensuring that every figure reported is backed by evidence and can be reused across different standards such as CSRD or SFDR.
TCFD and CSRD are highly compatible because both aim to integrate climate risk management into business strategy.
Under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), particularly E1, the structure of the disclosure mirrors the four TCFD pillars.
What the CSRD adds is a higher level of standardization, auditability, and digital reporting requirements.
Therefore, implementing a TCFD-based system positions companies ahead for CSRD compliance, since the conceptual framework, risk categories, and metrics are directly comparable.
The transition should be approached as a data governance and interoperability project, not just a reporting exercise.
Companies can follow these steps:
By treating TCFD as the base layer, organizations can reuse data efficiently, comply with new standards faster, and reduce audit costs.
Implementing TCFD reporting improves more than transparency—it enhances strategic foresight and investor confidence.
When a company quantifies its exposure to climate risks and defines adaptation or mitigation strategies, it demonstrates long-term resilience.
This strengthens its credibility in capital markets, supports access to sustainable finance, and enables better risk-adjusted decision-making.
Moreover, by integrating TCFD with enterprise risk management, organizations gain a holistic view of how environmental and financial variables interact, reinforcing strategic alignment across departments.
Dcycle provides a complete ESG data management platform that automates the entire climate disclosure process.
The system collects, validates, and reports ESG and climate data from multiple sources in a single environment, eliminating spreadsheets and manual work.
With Dcycle, companies can:
Dcycle transforms compliance into a strategic advantage, enabling companies to measure once and report everywhere with total consistency.
As of 2025, the trend is moving toward global alignment of reporting frameworks.
The ISSB standards (S1 and S2) are consolidating as the international baseline, while ESRS and CSRD define the European regulatory structure.
Other jurisdictions such as the UK, Canada, and Australia are aligning national rules with ISSB to ensure comparability and interoperability.
At the same time, regulators are demanding digital, auditable data, not narrative reports.
This shift increases the need for automated ESG platforms capable of managing structured and tagged data in formats like XBRL.
Companies that invest early in TCFD/ISSB-aligned systems will gain a competitive edge—they will report faster, with fewer errors, and with greater transparency.
Using centralized software addresses all these issues by providing a single source of truth for climate data.
Because digital tagging ensures that sustainability data is machine-readable, comparable, and auditable.
Under CSRD and ESRS, reports must be prepared in XBRL format following the ESRS taxonomy, and similar requirements are emerging globally.
This allows regulators, investors, and auditors to access structured data easily, improving transparency and oversight.
Modern TCFD/ISSB software already includes automated XBRL generation, ensuring companies are ready for regulatory submissions without extra manual effort.
.png){kind=small}
Carbon footprint calculation analyzes all emissions generated throughout a product’s life cycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, usage, and disposal.
The most recognized methodologies are:
Digital tools like Dcycle simplify the process, providing accurate and actionable insights.
Some strategies require initial investment, but long-term benefits outweigh costs.
Investing in carbon reduction is not just an environmental action, it’s a smart business strategy.
.png)
.png)
