How much does Sweep cost according to the available plans?
4 factors that influence Sweep’s cost
Why does Sweep’s price vary so much between companies?
3 trends driving up the cost of platforms like Sweep
Common mistakes when purchasing Sweep without aligning internal goals
Why Dcycle is the ESG solution that fits any use case
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
When we start looking for platforms to manage ESG data, sooner or later the key question comes up: how much does all this cost? Sweep’s prices are not always clear at first glance, but understanding how its model works is essential if we are considering this solution to organize our sustainability metrics.
Sweep is designed for companies that want to automate data collection, comply with complex regulations, and have everything ready for reporting. But that level of structure is not free, and certainly not standard.
Here we’ll see what is actually known about its pricing, what the plans include, and how far they go.
No guesses, no tangled marketing. Let’s get straight to the point.
Talking about Sweep's pricing means talking about broad ranges and scalable plans. It's not a flat-fee platform, and that makes sense: not every company needs the same when it comes to ESG.
What affects the price?
Two key factors determine how much you'll pay:
The more data volume, areas involved, and regulatory frameworks to comply with, the higher the cost. And that’s perfectly logical.
According to public sources, Sweep’s prices start around $250 per month. This type of basic plan usually includes:
Don’t expect customization, integration with internal systems, or process automation.
It’s an entry point into the ESG world, but not a full solution.
On the other hand, more advanced plans exceed $800 per month, and can reach $3,600 per year on platforms like AWS Marketplace. At that level, features typically include:
Many plans don’t include technical support or strategic assistance. If you want to adapt the platform to your operations, connect real-time data sources, or share information across teams, that might require additional services.
Also keep in mind that not all plans allow frictionless scaling.
Some features might be locked until you move up a level, which means renegotiating costs or switching subscriptions earlier than planned.
You're not just paying for a tool that generates reports. You're paying for the ability to structure your ESG data, automate its use, and output it according to regulatory frameworks you must comply with today (and tomorrow).
If that system doesn’t fit your pace or forces you to rely on manual processes, the price becomes irrelevant, because the real cost will be lost time and compounding errors.
Choosing a solution like Sweep is not just “paying for software”. It’s committing to a specific way of managing and structuring your ESG information.
Before making a decision, you must clearly understand what it covers, what it doesn’t, and most importantly, how it aligns with your company’s reality.
Sweep presents itself as a platform to organize, measure, and report ESG data.
It is not a consulting service or audit provider, but a digital solution designed to centralize information and make it valuable within current regulatory frameworks.
Its most notable features include:
All of this sounds good, but the real value depends on how well it integrates into your current workflow and whether the automation level is enough to avoid relying on manual or external processes.
The more you want to automate data collection, cleaning, and analysis, the higher the cost.
It’s not the same to upload Excel files manually once a quarter, as it is to connect APIs or internal databases for real-time automatic reporting.
Also, if you’re looking for custom dashboards or control panels adapted to your structure, that affects the final price as well.
This is one of the most critical points. Many companies want to cover all three emission scopes, but Scope 3 is the most complex and costly.
Why? Because it involves external data from suppliers, transportation, product usage, etc. And collecting that information requires more effort, more integration, and often more money.
The broader the scope, the more features you’ll need, and the higher the cost of your plan.
Using the platform for a single team is very different from deploying it across the organization.
The price varies depending on:
If you're aiming for cross-functional collaboration, the base cost probably won’t be enough.
There’s a big difference between a platform that just generates pretty reports, and one that connects to your existing systems without needing to manually export and import every piece of data.
Sweep allows for some integrations, but many are charged separately or require extra technical support. And that’s where costs can spike unexpectedly.
If you rely on ERP, BI, accounting, or financial tools already active in your company, make sure Sweep can integrate smoothly. That’s often not included in the base price.
This defines the time investment required to get onboard with the platform.
If it's the latter, you’ll need real automation and system connectivity.
If multiple teams are involved, the platform must support access controls and effective collaboration tools.
Answering these questions before signing up for any ESG solution is what separates a one-time expense from a strategic investment.
Sweep might be a valid option if you already know what you need, how you’ll use it, and what each plan offers.
If you're unsure, the problem isn't the tool, it's the approach.
No two companies are the same. And in ESG, each structure, need, and level of maturity has a direct impact on cost.
That’s why there’s no fixed price for Sweep.
It all depends on what you intend to do with the tool.
It’s not the same to be a company just starting to measure emissions, as it is to already have ESG indicators running and defined processes in place.
The more advanced your management model, the more specific features you’ll require and the more data connections will be needed.
This directly translates into a more complex platform, and therefore a more expensive one.
Not all reports demand the same depth or data level.
Creating an EINF isn’t the same as preparing a full CSRD report, or complying with Taxonomy or SBTi.
Each framework has its own structure, metrics, and timelines.
The more frameworks you need to address, the stricter the data model will need to be, and the heavier the operational load the platform must handle.
More production sites, suppliers, countries, or products mean more data to manage.
If you also require frequent reporting (monthly or quarterly, instead of annual), the platform must handle constant updates.
This requires greater capacity, more automation, and better integrations.
All of that drives up the cost.
Some platforms, including Sweep, offer advanced modules for emissions reduction simulations.
These let you test hypothetical scenarios:
They’re useful, but not included by default in all plans.
If you want to simulate future scenarios, that often means an added cost.
A valuable ESG tool not only centralizes data. It must allow you to see which areas contribute more or less, without needing to be a data expert.
If the platform offers simple, clear, and actionable visuals by team or unit, then it’s adding real value.
Measuring is good, but making decisions based on scenarios is another level.
If the platform lets you see how indicators would change with specific actions, that translates into direct strategic value.
Not all tools can handle multiple legal entities, international teams, or internal reporting hierarchies.
If your company has this level of complexity, you need a platform that can handle it without needing parallel services or duplicated work.
ESG management can’t live in isolation.
If the platform doesn’t integrate with your existing tools (spreadsheets, ERPs, CRMs, etc.), you’re multiplying tasks.
Valuable ESG solutions are those that integrate into your current systems and allow frictionless data flow.
The rising prices of ESG platforms like Sweep are not random. They're a response to real market changes, driven by new regulatory, operational, and tech demands.
To understand why these solutions cost what they do, we need to look at the context behind their growth.
It used to be enough to submit an annual report. Not anymore.
Regulations now require frequent, comparable, and auditable data.
And this pressure is no longer limited to Europe, it’s scaling globally.
Complying with frameworks like CSRD or the Taxonomy means having updated, traceable data ready to present at any time.
This is only possible with platforms that structure real-time data, not static solutions or manual reporting.
More companies are distributing ESG responsibility across departments.
It’s no longer just for the sustainability or compliance teams.
Finance, procurement, operations, communications, they all now play a role.
This demands platforms with real-time collaboration, differentiated permissions, and tracking by team or unit.
Such changes are forcing platforms to scale in design and functionality. And yes, also in price.
Today, it’s not enough to know what happened.
We need to be able to anticipate:
We want to see the impact before acting.
Only platforms that have evolved from data repositories to predictive analysis tools offer this.
And this layer of simulation and intelligence comes at a cost.
Before making a decision, it’s not enough to browse the site or check the pricing page.
You need to be clear on what problem you’re solving and what resources you have.
Here are a few key points to consider:
This defines how much time and effort onboarding will take.
If continuous, you’ll need automation and real system connections.
If multiple teams are involved, the tool must support collaboration and access controls.
Not all platforms are ready for every framework. It’s better to validate this before signing.
A tool that becomes outdated in 12 months isn’t an investment, it’s an expense.
In short, this isn’t about picking the cheapest tool. It’s about picking the one that lets you:
If that’s not guaranteed, the price doesn’t matter, it’s not a viable option.
Adopting an ESG platform without clearly defined objectives is like buying an ERP system without knowing what processes you want to automate.
The same applies to Sweep. If you haven't clearly defined:
...you’ll end up paying for features you don’t use, or missing the ones you actually need.
One of the most common mistakes is assuming that a carbon-focused platform automatically covers the social and governance aspects too.
Sweep specializes in the environmental component, particularly carbon emissions.
If your company needs to manage:
...you need to know that those layers aren’t included by default.
Thinking you’re covering “ESG” when you’re only addressing “E” leads to gaps in compliance and poor strategic alignment.
A platform can be technically solid, but if the team doesn’t know how to use it, it quickly becomes a sunk cost.
Sweep requires technical training for efficient use.
Even if some features are intuitive, the parts related to:
...take time and internal resources.
This effort is usually not included in the visible cost and is rarely factored into the decision.
Another frequent mistake is signing up before checking whether the platform integrates with your:
Then you end up duplicating tasks or doing manual uploads that eat up time and generate errors.
Before signing a contract, you must verify whether the platform can:
If not, you're just buying a digital island that will create more friction than value.
The listed price is just the entry point.
The real cost shows up once you start using the platform seriously.
Every integration, additional training, or unmet need outside the base plan... adds up.
And if you didn’t plan for that from the start, your budget will explode by month three.
It’s also important to note that many essential features are locked in the basic plans.
If you want:
...you’ll need to upgrade to a higher plan. And that jump isn’t cheap.
To ensure the tool functions as a true solution, not just another patch, you must:
Because this isn’t just about signing a contract.
It’s about ensuring the platform helps you:
If that’s not aligned from day one, the problem isn’t Sweep, it’s how you’re using it.
Another aspect often overlooked when budgeting for ESG platforms is the alignment with sustainable finance frameworks.
These frameworks can influence not only compliance strategies but also access to green financing and investor confidence.
In addition, measuring and managing your Carbon Footprint effectively is becoming a baseline expectation for both regulators and stakeholders.
In a market where many platforms focus solely on emissions or offer closed reporting models, we do the opposite.
At Dcycle, we are not auditors or consultants.
We’re a solution for companies that want real control over their ESG data, without relying on third parties or wasting time on manual tasks.
We connect all your ESG data, environmental, social, and governance, and structure it so you can use it in any scenario:
Everything starts from the same data, loaded once, and reusable across all frameworks required by your regulatory or strategic context.
No duplication. No silos. No excuses.
We:
Need a report? You’ve got it.
Want to monitor progress by team or unit? Done.
Interested in simulating reduction scenarios or prepping for an internal review? It's already there.
Whether you're just beginning to measure or already reporting under five different frameworks, we’re ready.
This is not about buying software. It’s about having a solution that grows with you, without falling short or being oversized.
And most importantly:
We don’t sell hype.
We tell you:
Because if your data can’t help you make decisions, or doesn’t meet your current or future compliance requirements, it’s worthless.
Dcycle is exactly that: a real ESG solution, designed so you don't fall behind.
And if you're at the point where you know that you need to measure in order to stay competitive, we’re here to help, without making it complicated.
Sweep’s most basic plans start around $250/month, according to third-party platforms.
These plans usually offer:
They don’t include:
It's an entry-level option, but if you want solid ESG management, it can fall short quickly.
Sweep offers scalable plans, but in practice, it’s more geared toward mid-sized and large companies.
The cost and complexity can make it a tough fit for a small company without an internal sustainability team.
The onboarding curve is high, both in money and operational effort.
Anything that requires more customization, connectivity, or predictive analytics is often not included in the base plan.
Examples include:
It’s crucial to review your contract to know what’s included and what counts as an extra module.
Yes, but with conditions.
Sweep helps you:
…but it depends on:
It’s not a plug-and-play solution that guarantees compliance without effort.
You’ll need to configure it, upload the right data, and often do some manual work beforehand.
.png){kind=small}
Carbon footprint calculation analyzes all emissions generated throughout a product’s life cycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, usage, and disposal.
The most recognized methodologies are:
Digital tools like Dcycle simplify the process, providing accurate and actionable insights.
Some strategies require initial investment, but long-term benefits outweigh costs.
Investing in carbon reduction is not just an environmental action, it’s a smart business strategy.
.png)
.png)
