These are the 10 best alternatives to Greemko in 2025
5 Factors to Consider When Choosing a Greemko Alternative
5 Benefits of Evaluating Alternatives to Greemko
4 Challenges When Switching ESG Platforms
Recommendations Before Choosing a Greemko Alternative
Why Dcycle Is the Best Alternative to Greemko
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
These are the 10 best alternatives to Greemko in 2025:
Looking for alternatives to Greemko has become a logical step for many companies that need to manage their ESG data clearly and without complications.
Today, sustainability is a strategic lever, and whoever does not measure their impact simply loses competitiveness.
More and more organizations understand that without reliable ESG data it is impossible to comply with regulations such as CSRD, the European taxonomy, EINF, SBTI or any other requirement that is already setting the market pace.
Measuring, managing and reporting is not optional, it is what allows you to play the game on equal terms.
In this article we are going to explore what options exist in the market, what benefits they offer and how to choose the most suitable ESG solution for your company.
Among the alternatives to Greemko, the most complete option is Dcycle.
We are not auditors or consultants, we are a solution designed for companies that want to stop struggling with spreadsheets, emails and manual processes to manage their ESG information.
With us you can gather all your ESG information in a single place and use it for any case: EINF, SBTi, CSRD, taxonomy, ISOs or whatever applies in your sector. No duplicated efforts, no wasted time and no dependence on third parties.
The difference is that we do not see sustainability as a cost, but as a real competitive advantage. If you do not measure your impact, you cannot compete on equal terms.
And the market does not wait, more and more companies already report and use their ESG data to make strategic decisions.
With Dcycle, what you get is order, speed and tangible results.
What makes us different:
In short, Dcycle turns ESG management into a growth lever, not into a headache.
Novisto presents itself as an all-in-one platform to manage all ESG data in one place.
It enables automatic data collection, which reduces errors and manual work.
It allows compliance with various standards and regulations (CSRD, GHG Protocol, etc.) adapting reports as needed.
It has dashboards that help visualize trends, compare key metrics and make decisions based on what the data shows.
Persefoni is another good alternative if we focus on Carbon Footprint management and reporting ready for strict regulations.
It is designed for large companies or financial institutions that need audit-ready reports.
It simplifies the collection and publication of extra-financial data, reducing the complexity usually involved in complying with ESG regulations.
Workiva is known for its ability to integrate data, facilitate collaboration among teams and provide traceability, key factors if you handle large amounts of ESG data.
It allows the centralization of information from different departments, which is essential if you manage supply, operations, governance, and more.
It includes features that help with auditable reports, something increasingly important as stricter standards apply to companies.
Diligent is another robust platform for reporting, monitoring and managing ESG matters, widely used when companies need to comply with demanding standards and maintain solid data governance.
It offers centralized data collection, helping to avoid redundancies and ensuring that all relevant information is accessible for different uses.
It incorporates tools for internal monitoring, ESG KPIs and external reports.
This way you can measure and demonstrate your actions in different areas.
IBM Envizi ESG Suite has the capacity to collect and manage complex ESG data from many sources, including sensors and operational systems.
It automates reports aligned with international standards, which helps companies comply with demanding regulations without redoing everything from scratch.
It also allows the identification of improvement opportunities (emissions, consumption, etc.), making it useful for both compliance and internal strategy.
Ecodesk is a cloud-based platform that helps you track, monitor and report ESG data in a structured way.
It is compatible with standards such as CDP, GRI, GHG Protocol, making it useful if you need to respond to different regulatory or market requirements.
It is ideal if you are looking for a tool that gives you a clear view of ESG metrics and can scale as you grow.
RepRisk focuses on ESG risks: reputation, governance, social or environmental impacts, and more. It monitors them continuously across companies, projects or sectors.
It is useful for due diligence, supply chain monitoring or staying alert to emerging risks that could affect your business.
It provides updated data and a broad database, making it a strong support tool if you need to monitor exposure to external risks.
Workday offers ESG capabilities within a broader ecosystem that also integrates finance, HR and other company operational data.
It allows for a holistic approach: not only ESG data in isolation, but how it connects with other business areas.
This helps if you want sustainability integrated into strategic decisions.
Plan A specializes in carbon accounting and emissions tracking across different scopes, making it a solid choice if the carbon footprint is one of your main focuses.
It automates tasks such as emissions calculation in different scopes, reducing manual errors and heavy work.
It is a good candidate if your company is starting to scale ESG reporting and you want a tool that manages environmental aspects well but also connects with other regulatory or reporting requirements.
When looking for alternatives to Greemko, it is not just about comparing prices or features.
The key is to choose a solution that truly helps you manage your ESG data and transform it into a competitive advantage.
The market is full of options, but not all respond to what a company needs to comply with EINF, SBTi, CSRD, taxonomy, ISOs or any other standard you must follow.
If this is not clear from the beginning, you risk ending up with a solution that only creates more work instead of simplifying processes.
One critical point is that the tool should allow the collection of all ESG information in a single place.
If data remains scattered among departments or providers, the process becomes messy and you lose traceability.
Each company must respond to different frameworks: CSRD, SBTi, taxonomy, ISOs.
That is why it is key that the solution automatically adapts the data to each format. This avoids duplicated efforts and increases efficiency.
What may seem enough today, tomorrow may fall short.
We need an alternative that grows with the company and can integrate new reports or metrics without starting from zero.
It is not only about meeting deadlines, but also about having reliable real-time data.
Poor ESG data quality not only causes errors in reports, it can also leave us out of markets that demand transparency and rigor.
The last factor, and perhaps the most important, is that the solution should not be just a simple report generator.
It must become a strategic tool for the company, helping to save money, gain time and improve efficiency in management.
In the end, choosing wisely among the different Greemko alternatives is what makes the difference between seeing sustainability as a cost or as a lever to compete seriously in your sector.
Another relevant aspect is understanding the sustainable finance frameworks that guide investment and reporting. These frameworks help align financial strategies with sustainability goals and ensure consistency with international standards.
Exploring alternatives to Greemko is not just about comparing tools.
Doing so opens the door to finding more efficient solutions, capable of adapting to real needs and turning sustainability into a driver of competitiveness.
By making the right choice, we can save money by eliminating manual processes, duplicates and time-consuming tasks.
A suitable solution centralizes information and allows us to work with reliable data without needing to spend more on external resources.
Sustainability demands keep growing.
That is why we need a platform that adapts to the company’s pace, integrating new reports or metrics without forcing us to change systems each time a new regulation appears.
Having reports ready and aligned with regulations such as CSRD, SBTi, ISOs, taxonomy is key.
Automating this process avoids errors, saves time and ensures that information is ready when the market or regulators request it.
A powerful alternative should easily connect with other solutions we already use: ERP, CRM or internal management platforms.
This ensures that data flows without friction and can be analyzed without losing consistency.
Many solutions hide additional costs in modules, licenses or external services.
Evaluating different options allows us to choose a platform with clear pricing models, where we know in advance what we pay and what we get.
In short, reviewing the different alternatives to Greemko is not just about comparing features.
It is the opportunity to find a solution that gives us efficiency, flexibility and control, while preparing the company to compete in a market where sustainability is no longer optional.
Choosing among different Greemko alternatives is not always easy.
Switching to a new ESG platform brings clear advantages, but it also comes with challenges that must be managed carefully if we want the transition to be smooth and truly add value.
The first obstacle is often migrating existing information. Many times the data is scattered, incomplete or duplicated.
If we do not ensure its quality from the start, the new system can drag inconsistencies that affect reporting.
Moving to a new solution requires that our team adapts to a different way of working.
If we do not train people or provide the necessary tools, we risk internal resistance and losing efficiency instead of gaining it.
For an ESG platform to be truly useful, it must connect seamlessly with existing systems: finance, operations, supply chain.
When integration is limited, we end up with parallel processes that consume more time and generate errors.
Even if the initial investment may seem high, the important thing is to understand that sustainability is a strategic lever.
If we measure, manage and report properly, we avoid penalties, gain efficiency and improve competitiveness. It is not an expense, but a future-oriented investment.
Overcoming these challenges when switching ESG platforms requires planning, well-organized data and a clear vision of where we want to take our company’s sustainability management.
If we do it right, the transition will not only be smoother, but it will also allow us to use ESG as a real competitive advantage.
Before deciding between different Greemko alternatives, we need to be clear about what we expect from the solution and how it will fit into our company.
It is not just about comparing features, but about ensuring that the chosen system complies with regulations, is practical to use and delivers strategic value.
The first step is to identify which frameworks we must comply with: CSRD, taxonomy, SBTi, ISOs, or EINF.
Each company faces different regulations, and if this is not clear, we may end up with a solution that does not cover our needs.
We must also set the key sustainability KPIs so the tool can capture them and allow real monitoring.
Not all platforms offer the same flexibility in terms of access. It is important to define who will use the solution and with what level of permissions.
Finance, operations, supply chain and management may all need different profiles.
Having this clear from the beginning avoids bottlenecks and ensures the ESG information flow works correctly.
A good solution cannot live in isolation. It must connect with the systems we already use, from ERPs to supplier management platforms.
The more integrations we have, the smoother the data collection will be and the less manual workload there will be for the team.
The initial price is not everything. We must evaluate the total cost of ownership (TCO): licenses, support, implementation and the platform’s ability to evolve.
It is useless to choose a cheaper option if later it generates hidden costs or fails to scale with the company.
In summary, analyzing these recommendations before choosing among Greemko alternatives ensures a strategic decision.
This way, we transform ESG management into a tool that gives us efficiency, control and competitiveness in the market.
In a market full of Greemko alternatives, what really makes the difference is having a solution that does not complicate things further, but instead makes them simpler and more useful. And that is where we come in.
At Dcycle, we are not auditors or consultants, we are a solution for companies that need to bring order to their ESG information and turn it into strategic value.
We collect all your ESG information and automatically distribute it into any framework you need: CSRD, taxonomy, ISOs, SBTi, EINF or any other standard. You stop wasting time adapting data manually and ensure that each report is ready when you need it.
Our pricing is simple and transparent, with no hidden costs. We do not believe in models that inflate the process with extra modules or hidden licenses. From the beginning you know what you pay and what you get, allowing you to plan with no surprises.
We also offer a comprehensive platform designed to save time and reduce complexity.
Everything that used to be a mess of spreadsheets, emails and duplicated processes is now centralized and automated.
But the most important thing is that we turn ESG data into a strategic lever for your business.
It is not about generating reports out of obligation, but about using that information to save money, gain efficiency and compete seriously in a market where sustainability is no longer optional.
With Dcycle, ESG management stops being a sunk cost and becomes a real competitive advantage.
The first step is to define which regulations you need to cover: CSRD, SBTi, taxonomy, ISOs or EINF.
It is also key that the solution allows you to centralize all your ESG information in a single system and that it adapts to your company’s growth.
Data reliability and ease of use should always be at the core of the decision.
Some alternatives offer more transparent pricing models, without hidden costs for additional licenses, extra modules or support.
This allows better planning and avoids budget surprises.
The important thing is not just paying less, but understanding the real value you get in return.
The best way is to define objective criteria in advance: regulatory scope, critical integrations, number of users and automation capacity.
That way, the decision is not based on marketing or promises, but on what really solves your problems.
We need to be clear about the quality and organization of the ESG data we already manage, define internal roles for the use of the new platform and evaluate which systems must be integrated.
Preparing this in advance reduces errors and makes the transition faster and less costly.
Because at Dcycle we are not auditors or consultants, we are a solution for companies that want to manage their ESG simply and strategically.
We collect all your ESG information and adapt it automatically to any regulatory framework. Our pricing is clear, with no hidden costs, and we offer a comprehensive platform that saves time and eliminates complexity.
Most importantly, we transform your ESG data into a competitive advantage, helping you comply with regulations and grow in the market.
.png){kind=small}
Carbon footprint calculation analyzes all emissions generated throughout a product’s life cycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, usage, and disposal.
The most recognized methodologies are:
Digital tools like Dcycle simplify the process, providing accurate and actionable insights.
Some strategies require initial investment, but long-term benefits outweigh costs.
Investing in carbon reduction is not just an environmental action, it’s a smart business strategy.
.png)
.png)
