CSRD double materiality isn’t just another sustainability buzzword.
It’s a mandatory requirement already in force, and it directly affects how you report.
We’re talking about looking in two directions:
how ESG risks affect you, and how you impact the environment.
Both count. And both must be reported.
Can we relax? Not really.
If you operate in Europe, or work with companies that do, you have to comply.
The sooner you understand and integrate this,
the better prepared you’ll be to avoid falling behind.
From here on, we’ll explain how this approach works, why it’s key to your strategy, and what you need to start doing right away.
The CSRD is not just another EU regulation.
It’s the new standard for sustainability reporting in companies.
It’s not about writing prettier reports, but about explaining with concrete data how the world affects you… and how you’re affecting the world.
This changes the rules of the game.
Especially if until now you only reported the bare minimum to comply.
Until now, we only talked about financial materiality: which environmental, social, or governance issues affect the business.
Now a second dimension enters: how the company impacts the environment on those same issues.
Both are equally important.
And yes, you must report on both.
The sustainability report can no longer stand alone.
It has to cross financial data with ESG data.
This means integrating what happens outside (with the environment, stakeholders, the value chain)
with what happens inside (risks, profitability, strategic decisions).
If we don’t include the full context, the report is incomplete.
It’s no longer enough to have scattered data in Excel sheets or emails.
We need to structure ESG information in a way that makes it useful for multiple reports.
From emissions to social or governance indicators: everything must be connected.
This approach can’t be handled by a single department.
Legal, sustainability, finance, operations… all must align data and criteria.
The challenge? Getting them to speak the same language and understand this is strategic, not just another requirement.
Once you have your ESG data well-organized, you’re not just complying with CSRD.
You can also use it for Taxonomy, ESRS, ISOs, SBTi, or EINF.
What used to be isolated reports becomes a network of connected data.
And if you do it right, you can save time, money, and headaches.
Experience our platform firsthand, schedule a demo.
Double materiality sounds complex, but it doesn’t have to be.
The key is to bring it down to earth and align it with your actual business reality—without drowning in bureaucracy.
Chances are, you’re already collecting ESG data for other reports.
Use that as your foundation. No need to reinvent anything. What works for EINF or ISO can work for CSRD too, if you structure it properly.
Got internal surveys? Supplier audits? Sustainability indicators?
They all feed into your materiality analysis. You just need to connect the dots.
Don’t prioritize a topic just because it’s trendy.
If your biggest impact is in your supply chain or your transport emissions, that’s where you need to focus, even if it’s not flashy.
Double materiality isn’t a checklist. It’s a tool to help you prioritize what really matters.
Contexts shift. Priorities evolve. Your business changes.
So make sure you review your materiality analysis at least once a year, or sooner if something big happens: a new regulation, a supplier scandal, a reputational issue...
Don’t let your reporting become outdated before it’s even published.
Let’s face it: many companies publish materiality maps that say absolutely nothing.
If you want to do it right, here’s what must be included to make your analysis meaningful and bulletproof.
Saying “we talked to stakeholders” isn’t enough.
Who did you talk to? How? What did they say? That all needs to be clear and documented.
And don’t stick to the usual suspects.
Include voices that often go unheard: local communities, small and midsize enterprises, trade unions, relevant NGOs.
Double materiality maps often look like colorful dartboards. But if you can’t explain why those topics are ranked where they are, they’re pointless.
Define your criteria clearly: potential impact, urgency, regulatory pressure, geographic relevance, whatever fits your context, but make it consistent.
Yes, it helps to show it in a matrix: X-axis = impact on business, Y-axis = impact on the environment and society.
Your materiality map can’t live in a vacuum.
If something is material, it should be reflected in your goals, KPIs, or policies.
Say climate change is a top issue? Then show how it’s influencing your decisions—supplier choices, product design, investment priorities.
Most of your environmental and social footprint doesn’t come from your HQ or your operations. It comes from your supply chain.
And the CSRD makes this crystal clear: you are expected to report beyond your direct scope.
Double materiality means you need to ask:
How do our suppliers impact people, ecosystems, and regulatory risks?
And how do their practices feed back into our own business risks?
Examples:
The challenge is real: most suppliers don’t have the systems or knowledge to report ESG data reliably.
But the solution isn’t more pressure, it’s smarter collaboration.
If you can’t see what’s happening in your value chain, you can’t manage it. And if you report on assumptions, you risk audits, fines, and broken trust.
What the CSRD truly changes is not just reporting, it’s how companies think.
With double materiality, sustainability is no longer external. It becomes part of how the entire business is run.
No more ESG-as-an-afterthought. No more “reporting season panic.”
If a topic is material, it belongs at the center of decision-making.
This means:
Real transformation starts when compliance becomes culture.
When ESG becomes everyone’s job, not just something “the sustainability person” deals with once a year.
And that’s what makes your company resilient, credible, and ready for what’s next.
Managing double materiality with spreadsheets or fragmented tools simply doesn’t scale. When dozens of indicators, multiple departments and financial-ESG cross-referencing are involved, Excel becomes a bottleneck, not a solution.
A proper tech platform allows you to structure ESG data, ensure traceability, and collaborate seamlessly. You gain not only clarity, but also speed and trust in your reporting process.
Human error is one of the biggest risks in sustainability reporting: duplicated numbers, outdated files, or inconsistent formats. With automation, you can integrate data sources, update indicators in real time, and guarantee consistency across all reports.
Automation isn’t just about efficiency, it’s about protecting yourself from regulatory risk and audit surprises.
A well-designed ESG platform isn’t just a reporting tool, it’s a decision-making enabler. When ESG indicators are tied to procurement, logistics, operations or finance, you can adjust actions based on real-time insight.
Double materiality becomes part of how you run your business every day, not just once a year.
Learn how we’re different, schedule a demo.
Many reports are filled with nice-sounding but useless metrics. The real value lies in selecting indicators that reflect your true impact and risk profile. You don’t need to report everything, just what’s material.
Choose KPIs that guide decisions, not just impress readers. If an indicator doesn’t inform action, it’s just noise.
It’s not enough to define good indicators, they must remain relevant. Set clear responsibilities, update frequencies and communication processes.
Sustainability evolves, and your indicators must evolve too. Keep them current, verifiable, and ready for external scrutiny. That’s how you build confidence and consistency over time.
ESG indicators shouldn’t sit in a report and collect dust. They should feed into real decisions: replacing suppliers, rethinking logistics, redesigning products.
When ESG data is embedded in daily operations, it creates value, not just compliance.
Too often, boards treat ESG as secondary. That’s a mistake. Double materiality directly influences strategy, risk and reputation.
It’s not about ticking boxes or polishing reports, it’s about long-term business continuity and positioning.
Ignoring it is not a neutral stance, it’s a liability.
To fulfill their governance role, board members should ask tough questions:
Double materiality is not about reputation management anymore. It’s about protecting stakeholders, anticipating regulatory exposure, and making better capital decisions.
For any board, understanding and overseeing ESG data through sustainable governance is no longer optional, it’s a core part of responsible governance.
It’s an approach that requires us to look in two directions:
how ESG topics affect our business, and how we impact the environment and society.
CSRD asks us to report on both, with clear and objective data.
Not all… for now.
But if you’re within the scope of CSRD (or work with someone who is),
you’ll have to apply for it sooner than you think.
And if you’re already reporting, it’s best to do it right from the start.
First, identify key ESG topics from both perspectives.
Then, collect and structure the relevant data.
And finally, integrate it into your reports in a coherent and actionable way.
It’s not just another box to tick, it’s a mindset shift.
No. It goes much further.
It forces you to make strategic decisions based on real data.
The report is just the visible part.
What matters is everything behind it that makes the report meaningful.
Dcycle is not a consultancy or audit firm.
We are a solution that centralizes and distributes all your ESG information across the different use cases you need:
CSRD, ISOs, SBTi, Taxonomy…
We collect the data, structure it, and help you turn it into decisions, reports, and competitive advantages.
Without the mess.
.png){kind=small}
Carbon footprint calculation analyzes all emissions generated throughout a product’s life cycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, usage, and disposal.
The most recognized methodologies are:
Digital tools like Dcycle simplify the process, providing accurate and actionable insights.
Some strategies require initial investment, but long-term benefits outweigh costs.
Investing in carbon reduction is not just an environmental action, it’s a smart business strategy.
.png)
.png)
