Price range for Lucanet (indicative)
What you need to know before choosing a financial reporting and consolidation solution
What does the price of a solution like Lucanet really include and how to evaluate it
3 current trends in consolidation and reporting solutions
3 common mistakes when investing in financial and ESG reporting solutions
Why Dcycle is the ESG solution that adapts to any use case
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Knowing how much Lucanet costs is not as simple as looking for a pricing table on its website. Most solutions of this type work with customized quotes, adjusting the cost according to the company’s size, the number of users, and the modules contracted.
This means that the price can vary greatly from case to case.
Before making a decision, it is important to assess whether the investment truly provides value. It is not just about paying for a license, but about checking if the tool integrates with our processes, complies with the regulations we need, and helps us save time and money in our daily work.
In the following sections, we will go into detail on what influences the price, how to estimate the real cost, and what factors should be considered to decide if it is the right solution.
Although there is no public official list, we can say that Lucanet’s price depends on several factors: company size, operational complexity, data volume, and integration level with other systems.
This means that each quote is personalized and that there is no single flat rate for everyone.
In practice, we must understand that the real cost is not only in the license, but in everything involved in getting the solution up and running: configuration, possible additional developments, team training, and support.
Ignoring these points can lead us to underestimate the total investment.
If we want to make the most of such a tool, it is essential to assess whether the investment helps us centralize financial and ESG information, comply with the regulations that apply to us, and gain agility in data analysis.
Lucanet is a solution focused on financial reporting and consolidation that many companies are evaluating to centralize and structure their financial data.
Its proposal combines planning, control, and analysis functionalities, making it easier to have a clear and unified view of the financial situation.
In the ESG context, its relevance has grown because more and more companies need to link their financial data with non-financial information to comply with regulations such as EINF, CSRD, SBTI, or the EU Taxonomy.
Having a platform that can connect all this information has become a key factor to comply with standards and be more competitive in the market.
Before deciding on a tool like this, it is essential to understand that the value is not only in the features it offers, but in how it integrates with our ESG data collection system.
If we do not measure and properly manage that information, we will fall behind and lose opportunities to companies that do.
Lucanet’s cost is not the same for a small business as it is for a multinational. The more complex the structure, with subsidiaries, different markets, or multiple currencies, the more functionalities and technical capacity will be required.
Operational complexity directly impacts the price, because it requires more advanced configuration and more specialized support.
It is not the same to consolidate a few reports as it is to manage large volumes of financial and ESG data. The more data there is to process, the more storage, calculation capacity, and real-time connection will be required.
If we also integrate ESG indicators alongside financial ones, the system must be capable of centralizing everything reliably, avoiding duplicates and errors.
In many cases, the price also varies depending on additional contracted services, such as extended technical support, training sessions, or external consulting.
It is important to evaluate whether we really need these extras or if we can manage them internally. Paying for what we do not use is wasted money, so we should be clear on what brings value from day one.
A key factor in the budget is the level of integration with other systems such as ERP, ESG solutions, or Business Intelligence tools.
The more seamless and automatic the connection, the more efficient daily management will be.
If we can link all the data in a single platform, we reduce time, avoid errors, and make better use of the investment.
Understanding what is and is not included in the price of a solution like Lucanet is essential to avoid surprises.
It is not just about the license, but about a set of elements that, if managed well, make the difference between a profitable investment and uncontrolled spending.
The initial price usually covers access to the platform and a set of standard modules. It is important to confirm which modules are included and which require additional payment.
We must ask ourselves: Are we paying for functionalities we will actually use?
Every solution of this type requires a parameterization phase to adapt it to our processes. If customization is minimal, the cost will be lower, but if we need complex workflows or integration with ESG processes, such as those defined in sustainable finance frameworks.
Before signing, it is advisable to demand a clear breakdown of these hours and their cost.
One of the points that can most increase the project cost is integration with ERP, ESG systems, or BI tools. The key question is whether these integrations are included or will be quoted separately.
We must also consider whether the connection will be automatic and in real time or if it will require manual processes, especially when dealing with indicators such as Carbon Footprint.
No matter how powerful the tool is, if our team does not know how to use it, we will not see results. Training should be part of the initial price or at least be clearly quoted.
It is also important to consider ongoing training for new versions or modules.
Some providers include unlimited support and automatic updates, while others charge separately. This is an expense that, if not planned from the start, can inflate the bill year after year.
The stability and response speed of support directly influence the efficiency of use.
Beyond the first year, we must ask ourselves: What will happen when we need more users, more storage, or more calculation capacity? These increases usually come with a cost, and it is better to anticipate them than to discover them when they are urgent.
In short, the value of the investment is not only in the initial figure, but in everything it allows us to save and optimize over time.
A solution that centralizes financial and ESG data, adapts to changing regulations, and grows with the business will always be more profitable than a cheaper but limited option.
The first point to analyze is whether the solution allows us to comply with all the regulations that affect us, and whether it does so automatically without unnecessary manual processes.
If the platform integrates EINF, CSRD, SBTi, Taxonomy, or ISO requirements from the start, we avoid redoing reports and reduce the risk of missing deadlines or criteria.
A valuable tool should streamline the consolidation of financial and ESG data and allow us to analyze them without having to depend on multiple spreadsheets.
The faster we can turn data into ready-to-present reports, the more capacity we will have to make strategic decisions based on reliable information.
Every hour we spend on repetitive tasks is time we could invest in analysis and planning. If the solution automates data collection and processing, we reduce errors and eliminate duplicates.
This not only improves reporting quality, but saves time and money from day one.
The regulatory environment changes, and so do the needs of our company. We need a tool that grows with us, capable of adapting to new requirements and a greater volume of data.
A scalable solution avoids future costs and ensures we are prepared for any market change.
More and more companies are integrating ESG data with financial information in a single workflow. This allows for complete reports aligned with regulations without duplicating efforts or managing multiple tools.
The key is to centralize all data so it can be distributed in the format required by each case: EINF, CSRD, SBTi, Taxonomy, or any other standard.
The trend is clear: automate the entire process, from data collection to report generation and validation.
This reduces closing times, eliminates manual errors, and increases the reliability of information. The less time we spend on repetitive tasks, the more we can devote to analysis and strategic decisions.
It is no longer enough to deliver a final report; we need to demonstrate where the data comes from and how it was calculated.
Real-time traceability allows us to validate information instantly, making both internal and external audits easier, and strengthening confidence in the data we present.
When evaluating prices, the first thing is to align the investment with our organizational maturity level. If we are in an initial stage, we may need a solution that helps us structure and centralize data without requiring extensive customization.
If we already have consolidated processes, it will be crucial for the tool to integrate financial and ESG data and allow us to comply with all regulations from a single environment.
Comparing prices without understanding the real scope of the project is a mistake. We must analyze what functionalities we need today and which we will need in 2 or 3 years. This way, we avoid having to switch platforms prematurely and protect the investment.
Focusing solely on the lowest number can end up being expensive. A cheaper tool at the start may generate additional costs in support, integrations, or manual processes that we had not anticipated.
Business changes and regulations evolve. If the solution cannot grow in capacity and functionalities, we will quickly fall short.
The key is to choose a tool that can adapt to new requirements without having to rebuild the entire system.
Many initial budgets do not include technical support, training, or necessary adaptations. These hidden costs can represent a significant part of total spending if we do not consider them from the start.
The price shown in a commercial proposal rarely reflects the total cost of having the platform running the way we need it to.
To the license, we must add configuration, integrations, support, training, and ongoing maintenance. If we do not calculate this from the beginning, we may face an expense much higher than expected.
Another point that is almost never mentioned is the cost of not measuring and managing data properly. A bad choice can mean redoing processes, duplicating work, and wasting valuable time.
The most profitable investment is not always the lowest at the start, but the one that avoids friction and grows with our business.
At Dcycle, we are not auditors or consultants, we are a solution for companies that need to collect, manage, and distribute all their ESG data easily and in any format the market demands.
Our platform allows you to centralize all information and adapt it to multiple regulations such as EINF, CSRD, SBTi, Taxonomy, or ISOs, regardless of the company’s starting point.
This means there is no need to change systems every time the regulatory framework evolves.
We believe sustainability is a strategic lever to compete. If you do not measure, you cannot prove or improve your impact, and if you do not improve, you will be out of the market. With Dcycle, data becomes a real competitive advantage, not an obstacle.
There is no single price. The cost depends on company size, operational complexity, data volume, and the level of integration with other systems.
Budgets are personalized, so the final figure can vary greatly depending on our needs.
In most cases, these platforms offer a personalized demonstration, not an open free trial.
The idea is to show how the tool adapts to our context before presenting the financial proposal.
In addition to the license, the price can increase due to integrations with other systems, extended support, team training, and custom developments. These extra costs often represent a significant part of the total investment.
The key is to measure the return. If the solution does not reduce time, does not centralize data, and does not facilitate compliance, it is likely we are paying more than we should.
An internal audit of usage and results can give us the answer.
At Dcycle, we are not auditors or consultants, we are a solution for companies that centralizes all ESG information and adapts it to any use case: EINF, CSRD, SBTi, Taxonomy, ISOs, or whatever is needed.
Our approach is that you pay for a tool you truly use and that turns your data into a competitive advantage, avoiding extra costs and duplicated processes.
.png){kind=small}
Carbon footprint calculation analyzes all emissions generated throughout a product’s life cycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, usage, and disposal.
The most recognized methodologies are:
Digital tools like Dcycle simplify the process, providing accurate and actionable insights.
Some strategies require initial investment, but long-term benefits outweigh costs.
Investing in carbon reduction is not just an environmental action, it’s a smart business strategy.
.png)
.png)
