These are the 10 Best Software Solutions to Comply with the CSDDD
Why It Matters Now
3 Types of Software That Fit the CSDDD
How CSDDD Software Helps Ensure Compliance
5 Advantages of Implementing CSDDD Software
Dcycle: The ESG Solution for Any Use Case
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

These are the 10 best software solutions to comply with the CSDDD in 2025:
Complying with the CSDDD requires much more than good practices. It demands a CSDDD compliance software capable of collecting, analyzing, and connecting all ESG data across the organization and its value chain, ensuring traceability, transparency, and control at every stage.
Companies need tools that automate risk management, evidence collection, and report generation.
Only then can they demonstrate regulatory compliance, reduce manual workloads, and stay ahead of European regulatory demands.
Today, measuring and managing environmental, social, and governance impact is no longer optional.
Falling behind in this process means losing competitiveness and access to business opportunities in a market increasingly driven by data-based sustainable management.
In the following sections, we will see how to approach CSDDD compliance, what elements an effective solution must include, and how to integrate the entire process within a solid and future-ready ESG strategy.
Dcycle is a SaaS sustainability management solution that enables companies to collect, analyze, and report all ESG information automatically and centrally.
We are not auditors or consultants, but a solution for companies that need reliable and traceable data to comply with regulations such as CSDDD, CSRD, the EU Taxonomy, or ISO standards.
Our platform allows any organization to automate data capture, perform double materiality assessments, generate XBRL reports, and maintain full traceability of the information used in audits or regulatory reports.
All from a single environment, without manual processes or scattered spreadsheets.
Thanks to its modular approach, Dcycle enables mapping of value chain risks, managing evidence, and connecting ESG data flows with internal systems such as ERPs or financial tools.
In this way, companies can demonstrate real due diligence and adapt quickly to the requirements set by the CSDDD.
Dcycle turns sustainability into a strategic lever.
More and more companies are measuring their ESG performance and turning that data into competitive value.
If you don’t measure, you can’t manage, and if you don’t manage, you can’t improve.
With our technology, that entire process becomes accessible, traceable, and ready for any regulatory evolution.
Main advantages:
IntegrityNext focuses on risk management and due diligence in the supply chain, helping companies identify, monitor, and mitigate potential non-compliance related to human rights, environment, and governance.
Its approach is based on automating supplier monitoring and the structured collection of evidence and questionnaires.
It allows companies to build a complete overview of their entire value chain, evaluating direct and indirect suppliers and updating information using external data and risk signals.
This facilitates compliance with the CSDDD and other due diligence regulations, reducing administrative burden and improving traceability.
Main advantages:
Prewave stands out for its ability to monitor risks in real time across multiple supply chain levels (Tier N).
It uses data analytics and external sources to detect incidents, violations, or critical situations before they affect the business.
Its technology helps map the entire supplier network and establish specific action plans according to the type of risk detected.
This allows companies to comply with the CSDDD, reinforcing transparency and traceability of information throughout the procurement process.
Main advantages:
NAVEX offers a platform focused on compliance, ethics, and due diligence management, with special attention to whistleblowing channels and grievance mechanisms required by the CSDDD.
It allows companies to manage internal policies, track remediation processes, and maintain traceable records of incidents and corrective actions.
The goal is to help companies demonstrate due diligence clearly and in a documented manner before auditors or competent authorities.
Main advantages:
OneTrust combines risk management, privacy, and ESG compliance within a single environment, enabling organizations to maintain full control over third parties, contracts, and policies.
Its modular structure facilitates supplier assessment and the creation of automated due diligence workflows adapted to CSDDD and other international requirements.
It also integrates tracking and reporting tools that simplify auditing and accountability.
Main advantages:
This platform consolidates corporate-level ESG data and connects with internal systems to ensure coherence, traceability, and control.
It enables companies to align their due diligence with the CSDDD, linking risks, policies, and evidence with finance and operations.
Its approach helps automate reporting and prepare audit packages by regulatory requirement.
This reduces manual tasks and maintains a single reliable source of truth for all departments.
Main advantages:
With this GRC suite, we manage risks, third parties, and compliance in a single environment.
We can set up due diligence workflows, record incidents, and monitor remediations with owners, deadlines, and evidence.
Its modular structure allows us to adapt the compliance program to the CSDDD and scale it to new obligations without rebuilding processes.
Main advantages:
This platform centralizes narratives, data, and evidence to create consistent and auditable reports.
It helps link figures and documents with controls and approvals, avoiding silos between teams.
For CSDDD compliance, it facilitates traceability of changes and version control, ensuring that every statement has verifiable documentary support.
Main advantages:
With this approach, we unify risks, controls, and cases in a single operational workflow.
We can manage complaints and ethics channels, prioritize risks, and assign remediations with clear SLAs.
The data model allows us to map the value chain and connect external signals with internal processes, strengthening the due diligence required by the CSDDD.
Main advantages:
This GRC solution structures the compliance program from risk identification to action plan execution.
It enables us to demonstrate due diligence and maintain consistency across departments.
Its main strength lies in reusable frameworks, control matrices, and executive reports that streamline inspections and regulatory reviews.
Main advantages:
Complying with the CSDDD is no longer optional.
This European directive redefines how companies must manage their human rights and environmental risks throughout their entire value chain.
Its implementation represents a deep shift in how organizations operate, contract, and report.
Until recently, due diligence was a voluntary exercise.
Now it becomes a legal obligation with direct consequences.
Companies unable to demonstrate traceability, active policies, and supplier control will see their reputation, access to financing, and competitiveness in the European market seriously affected.
That’s why the time to act is now.
Having a solution that centralizes ESG data, automates evidence, and connects regulatory requirements is essential to be fully prepared.
If we don’t measure or manage the risks in our value chain, we simply won’t be able to respond to the challenges ahead.
The CSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive) is a directive adopted by the European Union that requires companies to implement due diligence processes to prevent, mitigate, and correct negative impacts on human rights and the environment.
Its purpose is not only to make companies more responsible, but also to ensure there are verifiable procedures that guarantee these responsibilities are fulfilled through data, controls, and traceability.
It’s not about promises, but about demonstrating with evidence how we manage risks and what results we achieve.
In practice, this means mapping suppliers, assessing risks, handling complaints, and reporting progress transparently, with systems that allow auditing every step of the process.
It’s a structural change that requires organization, data, and internal coherence.
The CSDDD is applied progressively, depending on company size and revenue.
In 2025, it mainly affects large European corporations and non-EU groups with significant operations within the EU.
Over the next few years, its scope will expand to more companies and sectors.
Its requirements are clear:
Identify and evaluate risks, establish action and remediation plans, provide accessible grievance channels, and demonstrate full traceability over policies, suppliers, and outcomes.
All this must be documented and ready for review by competent authorities.
In short, it’s not enough to have written policies.
You must prove their real implementation, with updated data, verifiable evidence, and ongoing management involving the entire value chain.
Directive (EU) 2024/1760 entered into force on July 25, 2024, following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union on July 5, 2024.
Since then, Member States have a national transposition period to adapt their legislation before full application.
During 2025, each country will define its own timeline and supervision mechanisms, but the direction is already clear:
the CSDDD will be mandatory and binding.
Companies must anticipate to avoid being left behind when authorities begin requiring reports and evidence.
In this context, having a system that automates the collection and distribution of ESG data is essential.
It enables compliance with the CSDDD from a practical and scalable perspective, connecting all existing corporate data with the new directive’s requirements.
The CSDDD is part of the European regulatory ecosystem, together with the CSRD, ESRS, and the EU Taxonomy.
All share the same goal: ensuring companies collect, manage, and communicate ESG data in a consistent and verifiable manner.
To comply with these regulations, it’s crucial to work with a centralized ESG information source that feeds the various reporting frameworks.
This ensures that the data used to assess risks, prepare reports, or respond to audits is consistent, avoiding duplication and contradictions.
The key is to connect information flows between departments and regulatory frameworks.
When data is properly managed, a company can address the CSDDD, CSRD, and EU Taxonomy from the same environment, reducing effort and guaranteeing traceability and consistency.
In addition to these frameworks, companies increasingly align their strategies with sustainable finance frameworks that connect ESG performance with financial decision-making. These frameworks help translate sustainability commitments into measurable and finance-linked outcomes, reinforcing both transparency and accountability.
The CSDDD requires companies to demonstrate how they manage risks and impacts related to human rights and the environment throughout their value chain.
It’s not enough to identify issues; they must prove that there are active and traceable processes showing how those issues are handled and corrected.
Below are the five operational pillars every company must meet to be prepared.
The directive requires identifying actual and potential risks throughout the entire supply chain, including indirect suppliers.
This means gathering structured information, external data, and evidence to assess risks by country, sector, and purchase category.
Monitoring must be continuous and based on verifiable data.
With this, companies can anticipate incidents, set priorities, and demonstrate control over their value chain.
When an impact or non-compliance is detected, the company must document how it acts to resolve it.
The CSDDD requires defining remediation processes with clear responsibilities, deadlines, milestones, and evidence.
Actions must be recorded through RCA (Root Cause Analysis) and CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Actions) workflows, ensuring complete traceability from detection to results verification.
Each company must provide accessible and confidential channels for any stakeholder to report a complaint or issue related to the supply chain.
These channels must be integrated into a system that allows registering, tracking, and closing cases in a verifiable manner, maintaining full traceability that demonstrates the required due diligence.
The CSDDD requires incorporating due diligence policies and specific contractual clauses in agreements with suppliers and partners.
This ensures that obligations extend throughout the entire value chain.
It is essential to maintain version control, acceptance, and traceability of each document.
This way, companies can prove that policies are communicated, signed, and enforced across all business relationships.
The final pillar is reporting with verifiable documentary support.
Companies must demonstrate, using data, indicators, and evidence, every measure implemented and result achieved.
This information links to the CSRD, ESRS, and EU Taxonomy frameworks, leveraging the same ESG data for different obligations.
Thus, compliance becomes an integrated system of management, traceability, and continuous improvement.
Complying with the CSDDD requires tools capable of centralizing information, automating processes, and demonstrating evidence in a structured way.
It’s not about adopting a single solution, but about connecting different types of software that cover the full due diligence cycle—from risk detection to remediation and final reporting.
The first group of solutions focuses on mapping and assessing risks in the value chain.
This type of software enables multi-tier supplier monitoring (Tier N), detecting risk signals, and issuing automatic alerts in case of incidents or non-compliance.
Its main function is to identify vulnerabilities early, combining internal and external data, which facilitates action prioritization and proactive compliance with the directive.
Another group of tools focuses on compliance management, policies, and controls.
These solutions help deploy contractual clauses, train teams, manage evidence, and maintain traceability of policy acceptance by suppliers or partners.
Integrating third-party management within the GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) framework allows alignment of CSDDD obligations with other regulatory frameworks, consolidating a global compliance approach.
The third type of software acts as a central ESG data hub, where all required sustainability information is collected, normalized, and distributed for reporting.
This hub connects data from multiple internal sources, automates calculations, and generates reports that simultaneously comply with CSDDD, CSRD, and EU Taxonomy.
Having an integrated reporting system simplifies audits and ensures that all indicators are updated with verified data, eliminating duplication and errors.
The goal of a CSDDD-aligned software is to turn due diligence into a continuous, measurable, and traceable process.
Each module or functionality must help capture, process, and document the information needed to demonstrate compliance before auditors or supervisors.
The first step is to combine internal data with external signals (adverse news, sector assessments, or risk databases) to build a comprehensive view of the value chain.
The more structured data we have, the stronger our diagnosis will be.
A solid system should assign risk scores to each supplier, category, or country, and enable automated investigation workflows when incidents or deviations are detected.
This way, the assessment doesn’t remain a static report but evolves over time with the available data.
Complying with the CSDDD means documenting corrective and preventive actions (CAPA), designating responsible owners, and setting deadlines.
A good software platform allows recording each step, updating case statuses, and maintaining full traceability until results are verified.
Another essential component is a grievance and whistleblowing system that is accessible, secure, and auditable.
These tools allow cases to be logged, classified, and resolved in a structured way, ensuring transparency and traceability throughout the entire process.
Finally, the software should allow the generation of reports and evidence linked to the specific articles of the CSDDD, so that the information can easily be presented to auditors or authorities.
This level of traceability, supported by verifiable data, reduces report preparation time and provides a solid basis to demonstrate compliance, maintain stakeholder trust, and ensure operational continuity amid new European regulatory requirements.
Trying to comply with the CSDDD without specialized software is, in practice, almost impossible in the medium term.
The directive requires traceability, verifiable data, and updated evidence at every stage of the process.
Doing this manually with spreadsheets or scattered documents multiplies errors, delays audits, and creates inconsistencies between teams.
One of the main challenges is maintaining a complete view of the value chain.
Without a tool that centralizes information, it becomes very difficult to know which suppliers pose the greatest risks, which policies have been accepted, or which remediations remain open.
Information becomes fragmented and unreliable.
Furthermore, each new regulation — whether CSDDD, CSRD, or EU Taxonomy — requires updated and traceable data.
If we don’t have a system that connects them automatically, we end up duplicating tasks, copying information, and losing consistency in our reporting.
A CSDDD compliance software allows companies to transform compliance into a structured and continuous process.
Instead of reacting to each requirement, we can automate data collection, coordinate teams, and generate real-time evidence.
This saves time, reduces errors, and improves data reliability.
With the right software, we gain visibility across the entire supply chain, not just direct suppliers.
We can detect risks at multiple levels (Tier N), monitor incidents, and receive automatic alerts for any deviation.
This gives us a global view of risk and enables preventive, not just corrective, action, aligning compliance with business strategy.
Centralizing ESG data in a digital system prevents repetitive tasks, human errors, and duplications.
All information is updated automatically, and teams work from a single source of truth.
This reduces administrative burden and ensures that every piece of information used in reports or audits is consistent and verifiable.
A CSDDD software makes it easy to keep policies, contractual clauses, and supporting evidence perfectly aligned.
Each update is automatically distributed and recorded, with full traceability of acceptance and compliance.
This ensures that all stakeholders — internal and external — work under the same criteria and with validated information.
Having a structured system allows us to respond to auditors or supervisors without improvisation.
All information is centralized, documented, and traceable.
This speeds up reviews, improves transparency, and strengthens confidence in the company’s compliance processes, both internally and with third parties.
A CSDDD-oriented software should not operate in isolation.
The key is to reuse ESG data to also comply with CSRD, ESRS, or EU Taxonomy within the same environment.
This prevents duplication, maintains consistency across reports, and allows multi-framework compliance from a single data source, optimizing resources and strengthening overall data governance.
A good CSDDD compliance software must help control the entire value chain, automate risk management, and ensure traceability in every decision.
It’s not about gathering more data, but about having connected, verifiable, and auditable information.
The goal is to turn due diligence into a continuous process, where procurement, sustainability, and compliance teams work on a shared database, with clear workflows and accessible evidence at all times.
The first requirement is integration with internal company systems (ERP, CRM, or supplier platforms).
This way, we can cross-reference operational data with external risk signals, such as adverse news, sector indicators, or regulatory data.
This provides a complete and up-to-date view of risk, without depending on manual updates or periodic reports.
The more connected the data, the stronger the due diligence management will be.
The CSDDD requires documented and measurable action plans.
Therefore, the software should enable the creation of custom workflows, assign responsibilities, and set clear SLAs (maximum response or resolution times).
These workflows allow companies to track each case, prioritize incidents, and maintain a verifiable record of all corrective or preventive actions applied.
The directive also requires accessible complaint and whistleblowing channels.
A robust system must integrate these mechanisms, ensuring confidentiality, traceability, and documented resolution.
Managing complaints within the same environment allows linking each case to its evidence, connecting internal stakeholders, and maintaining a complete audit trail of the process.
Traceability is key.
An effective CSDDD software must include data governance, change logs, and version control for every document or report.
This ensures we know who modified what, when, and why — essential for audits and regulatory reviews.
It also guarantees consistency and reliability in the information shared between teams or external entities.
The European regulatory landscape is increasingly complex.
That’s why the software should support multiple frameworks simultaneously, not just the CSDDD, but also LkSG, EUDR, and other national or sectoral standards.
Having an adaptable tool avoids duplication and allows reusing the same ESG data for different reports and requirements, reducing costs and simplifying management.
Complying with the CSDDD is not just a legal obligation, but an opportunity to improve processes, strengthen supplier relationships, and build market trust.
When we measure, manage, and report accurately, we turn sustainability into a strategic advantage.
Companies with solid data not only comply earlier but also make faster, better-informed decisions.
The difference lies not in who has more data, but in who organizes it better and turns it into real business value.
With the right technology and an integrated management approach, compliance stops being a bureaucratic task and becomes a long-term competitive advantage.
Before implementing a CSDDD compliance software, we must understand that it’s not just about digitizing processes. The key is to structure ESG information and ensure alignment with reporting principles like EINF, so that data can be leveraged throughout the entire compliance cycle — from risk detection to remediation, traceability, and reporting.
A good starting point is to align teams, data sources, and internal systems, ensuring everyone works from a single dataset and can demonstrate due diligence with real evidence.
The first step is to identify and classify risks associated with your value chain.
Analyze factors such as country of origin, sector of activity, and procurement category, combining internal data with external information.
From this diagnosis, you can define a roadmap to prioritize suppliers and establish control measures proportional to the detected risk.
The more accurate the risk map, the easier it will be to automate alerts and action plans in the future.
Once risks are identified, formalize clear policies and contractual clauses.
Each supplier must acknowledge and accept the conditions required by the directive, and the entire process must remain recorded, versioned, and traceable.
This implies establishing different levels of obligation depending on the supplier’s criticality, ensuring that requirements are proportional and aligned with the business relationship.
Having an operational grievance and whistleblowing channel is a direct requirement of the CSDDD.
It’s not enough to simply create a form — the system must allow cases to be registered, classified, escalated, and closed, maintaining complete traceability of every interaction.
A well-designed channel not only reduces legal risks, but also strengthens internal transparency and proves that the organization has real mechanisms of control and response in place.
When a non-compliance or incident is detected, we must demonstrate how we act, in what time frame, and with what results.
For that, we need workflows that assign responsibilities, define KPIs, and document evidence.
Remediation plans must be measurable and updatable, allowing continuous tracking of their evolution and ensuring that the entire process is backed by verifiable data.
CSDDD compliance shouldn’t depend on lengthy reports that nobody reviews.
We must translate all collected information into executive KPIs that show progress, open risks, and the level of compliance achieved.
It is also essential to prepare automated audit packages, with traceable evidence for each article of the directive.
This significantly reduces review times and improves preparedness for external inspections or supervision.
In this context, Dcycle is the tool that enables companies to automate and centralize all ESG data, eliminating manual processes and ensuring total traceability.
We are not auditors or consultants, but a technological solution for companies that need to measure, manage, and report with accuracy.
We collect all ESG data and distribute it across different use cases: CSDDD, CSRD, EU Taxonomy, SBTi, or ISO standards, including key environmental metrics like Carbon Footprint, adapting to each organization’s needs.
With our platform, we transform sustainability into a competitive advantage.
We help companies manage their data coherently, comply with European regulatory frameworks, and be ready for any new obligation that arises.
Because what isn’t measured can’t be managed, and what isn’t managed can’t be improved.
The CSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive) is a European directive that obliges companies to identify, prevent, and correct risks and impacts related to human rights and the environment throughout their entire value chain.
Its scope goes beyond direct suppliers.
It requires visibility across all tiers (Tier N) and the ability to demonstrate, with traceable data, how we manage incidents, policies, and outcomes.
In practice, it means integrating sustainability into corporate governance, with continuous control processes, verifiable evidence, and regulated reporting.
The CSDDD will be implemented progressively, according to company size and revenue.
In 2025, it applies mainly to large companies with significant operations in the European Union, whether EU-based or foreign.
Over the coming years, its reach will expand to medium-sized enterprises and groups with a relevant impact on European supply chains.
Each Member State will define its own transposition timeline, but the obligation to apply due diligence is already firm.
Therefore, it’s best to start preparing now by establishing a solid and automated ESG management structure that allows compliance from day one.
Due diligence is a permanent risk management process, not a one-time audit.
It involves mapping, monitoring, and remediating potential impacts continuously, keeping traceability and evidence over time.
A supplier audit, on the other hand, is usually a retrospective and isolated control.
The CSDDD goes further — it requires ongoing vigilance over the entire value chain and proof that the company acts on any signs of risk or non-compliance.
The key difference lies in continuity.
Due diligence becomes part of the company’s daily operations, supported by digital tools that guarantee traceability and consistency.
A robust CSDDD compliance software must cover all critical points of the due diligence cycle.
Specifically, it should include:
Ultimately, it must turn dispersed ESG data into an organized and verifiable system, ready for audit at any moment.
These three regulations share the same ESG data foundation.
The data used to assess risks under CSDDD is the same that feeds CSRD sustainability reports and EU Taxonomy disclosures.
In practice, this means that if ESG data is properly managed, a company can comply with multiple frameworks simultaneously, avoiding duplication and maintaining consistency between reports.
The challenge is not generating more data, but organizing and connecting it.
When ESG data is centralized and distributed across use cases (CSRD, ESRS, EU Taxonomy, SBTi, ISO), compliance becomes a real competitive advantage and a solid foundation for decision-making.
Because the volume of information required by the directive is massive — supplier risk data, corrective actions, complaint records, indicators, and audit trails.
Without automation, it is impossible to keep everything updated and traceable.
Automation enables data collection and validation, workflow orchestration, and real-time updates across departments.
It ensures that all teams work with consistent, auditable information and that compliance can be demonstrated at any time.
Ultimately, automation is what turns due diligence into a scalable and reliable process.
Yes, indirectly.
Although the directive initially targets large corporations, it also impacts SMEs that operate as suppliers within the value chain of larger groups.
These SMEs will be required to comply with due diligence clauses, respond to questionnaires, and provide evidence of compliance with human rights and environmental standards.
Having an ESG data management system will help them stay competitive and maintain relationships with larger clients that are already required to comply with the CSDDD.
The most efficient approach is to integrate ESG data management into corporate operations as soon as possible.
This involves creating a single ESG repository, automating risk assessment workflows, and ensuring cross-departmental coordination between procurement, compliance, and sustainability teams.
During 2025, many companies will start with gap analyses to identify what information they already have and what processes need improvement.
From there, they can adopt modular software solutions that grow with their compliance needs.
Non-compliance with the CSDDD will have serious legal and reputational consequences.
National authorities will have the power to impose sanctions, restrict operations, or publish non-compliant companies.
In addition, affected stakeholders (such as employees or local communities) may initiate civil liability claims.
The cost of inaction — in fines, litigation, and reputational damage — will be far higher than the cost of implementing a compliance system.
In short, failing to prepare now could result in financial losses and loss of market access in the European Union.
Yes.
Dcycle is designed to integrate with any corporate system, such as ERP, CRM, or BI tools.
It connects to data warehouses, procurement platforms, or finance systems, synchronizing information automatically.
This interoperability enables companies to reuse their data, avoid duplication, and ensure coherence across ESG, compliance, and financial reporting.
It’s a plug-and-play solution that adapts to the company’s existing infrastructure and can scale as regulations evolve.
Dcycle maintains a complete audit trail of every change.
Each record, document, or report includes metadata, showing who modified it, when, and why.
All updates are stored securely and can be reviewed at any time.
This guarantees data integrity, transparency, and confidence during audits or regulatory reviews.
Every figure or statement in a report can be traced back to its original data source.
Absolutely.
Dcycle is designed for mid-market and large organizations operating in multiple countries.
It supports multi-language environments, localized regulatory settings, and multi-entity structures.
This allows global companies to harmonize ESG management across subsidiaries, while still meeting local legal requirements under frameworks such as CSDDD, CSRD, or EU Taxonomy.
Carbon footprint calculation analyzes all emissions generated throughout a product’s life cycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, usage, and disposal.
The most recognized methodologies are:
Digital tools like Dcycle simplify the process, providing accurate and actionable insights.
Some strategies require initial investment, but long-term benefits outweigh costs.
Investing in carbon reduction is not just an environmental action, it’s a smart business strategy.