The 10 Best Alternatives to Anthesis Lavola in 2025
4 Key Factors When Choosing an Alternative to Anthesis Lavola
5 Benefits of Exploring Alternatives to Anthesis Lavola
3 Common Challenges When Migrating from Anthesis Lavola
Why Dcycle Is the Best Alternative to Anthesis Lavola
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
These are the 10 best alternatives to Anthesis Lavola in 2025:
More and more companies are looking for alternatives to Anthesis Lavola because they need more than just one-off reports. Today the key is to have clear, centralized, and ready-to-use data for any situation.
It is no longer enough to measure for the sake of measuring. The important thing is to translate that data into strategic decisions that make a real difference.
The market is making it clear: if we do not measure, we fall behind. More and more companies understand that sustainability is not just a requirement, but a real lever of competitiveness.
We are talking about complying with regulations, saving money, optimizing processes, and opening new business opportunities.
In the following sections, we will go deeper into why it is essential to have a practical solution, what advantages it offers, and how you can start taking advantage of it today.
Dcycle is a solution for companies that want to move away from dependence on traditional consultancies.
We are not auditors or consultants, we are a platform that centralizes all your ESG data and transforms it into useful information for different goals
What we do is simple but powerful: we gather your information once and adapt it to the formats you need. This way you avoid duplicating efforts and work with consistent and reliable data at all times.
With Dcycle, sustainability becomes a strategic lever, not a formality. Measuring well means complying with regulations, saving money, improving processes, and gaining an advantage over those who are not doing it.
In practice, with Dcycle you can:
In short: a single ESG control center, designed so your company can be more competitive, more efficient, and better prepared for any regulatory or strategic challenge.
Sphera Cloud is a global platform for ESG and risk management.
Its approach combines environment, health, safety, and governance in one system, which makes it an interesting option for companies with complex operations.
What it offers in practice is:
The strong point of Sphera Cloud is its robustness for large organizations that need to integrate ESG with risk management.
EcoVadis is one of the most recognized platforms for evaluating suppliers.
Its proposal is focused on supply chains, generating comparable scores that allow the identification of risks and opportunities.
In practice, EcoVadis allows you to:
It is a key alternative if what you are looking for is to have real control over your supplier network.
Intelex combines ESG management with quality, health, safety, and environment (EHS) in a single platform.
It is known for its flexibility and customization, which makes it attractive for companies that want to adapt the system to their internal processes.
What stands out is:
Its main advantage is that it offers a broad management ecosystem, although it requires more internal resources to unleash its full potential.
Novisto focuses on improving ESG data quality and reporting.
It is a platform that helps structure information clearly and aligned with the main regulatory frameworks.
In practice, with Novisto you can:
The strength of Novisto lies in its capacity to transform data into ready-to-use reports for regulators, investors, and stakeholders.
Workiva is a solution that connects financial and non-financial data in a single environment.
Its strength lies in integrated reporting, making it easier to prepare ESG reports aligned with international regulations.
What it provides in practice is:
It is especially useful for companies seeking to align sustainability and finance in a single workflow.
Enablon specializes in risk, compliance, and sustainability management.
It is a platform designed for large corporations that need to control environmental, social, and governance risks on a large scale.
What it offers in practice is:
It is a solid alternative for organizations that need comprehensive ESG and risk management across multiple locations.
Persefoni has positioned itself as a reference in carbon and climate management.
Its proposal focuses on measuring GHG emissions and aligning objectives with international standards such as SBTi or TCFD.
What it enables is:
Its focus is on climate strategy, making it a powerful alternative if what you are looking for is progress in decarbonization and climate compliance.
Cority combines sustainability with EHS management (environment, health, and safety).
It is a modular platform, which allows companies to choose only what they need.
Its main advantages are:
It is a good option for companies that want to start with a specific area and grow towards a more complete ESG system.
FigBytes focuses on translating sustainability strategy into clear and actionable data.
Its proposal combines ESG reporting with visualization and strategic storytelling.
In practice, FigBytes helps to:
Its greatest strength is that it turns sustainability into a clear and measurable story, ready to be shared with investors, regulators, and clients.
One of the most important points is understanding which regulations we need to cover.
It is not the same to prepare an EINF as to work with CSRD, comply with the European Taxonomy, or align objectives with SBTi.
Each framework requires different data and specific formats.
That is why the key is to have a solution that gathers the information once and adapts it to all uses without duplicating efforts.
Another factor that makes the difference is who will work with the solution.
In many companies it is not just one department. Finance, sustainability, operations, purchasing, or communication all come into play.
We need a platform that allows real-time collaboration, with profiles adapted to each team. This way we avoid information silos and ensure that everyone works with the same updated data.
The reality is that managing ESG data manually is a mess. That is why the degree of automation offered by the solution is critical.
A good alternative must collect, organize, and calculate data automatically, reducing human errors and saving time.
This allows us to focus on strategy and decisions, not repetitive tasks.
Finally, we must consider how the solution connects with what we already use.
ESG data does not exist in isolation. It comes from finance, ERP, logistics, human resources, and more.
Ideally, the platform should integrate easily with internal systems to avoid duplicating processes. This way, all information flows and we can have a unified view of the company’s impact.
In addition, many companies are exploring sustainable finance frameworks to connect ESG reporting with investment strategies. This integration ensures that sustainability data not only meets compliance requirements but also aligns with financial decision-making.
When we centralize all ESG information in a single system, we avoid duplicating efforts and reduce unnecessary costs.
There is no need to pay several times for different reports or waste time gathering scattered data.
This translates into greater efficiency for the company, because teams work with the same information and can focus on strategic decisions instead of repetitive tasks.
The regulatory framework does not stop growing. Every year new requirements such as CSRD, Taxonomy, or SBTi appear.
A good alternative must be scalable, to adapt to these changes without having to redo processes from scratch.
This guarantees continuity and flexibility, ensuring that the data collected today also serves tomorrow’s regulations.
Traditional ESG reporting usually requires a lot of manual work, with risks of errors and wasted time.
With an automated solution, reports are generated directly from the data, ready to comply with different standards.
This not only saves time, but also increases data reliability, because we eliminate the margin for human error.
In practice, ESG data does not live in isolation. It is connected with finance, logistics, human resources, or purchasing.
A truly useful alternative must integrate with the systems we already use, without forcing us to change everything.
This way we achieve a unified vision of ESG impact and work with smoother processes, without friction between teams or platforms.
One of the clearest advantages of exploring alternatives is pricing transparency.
Many traditional solutions end up generating hidden costs in consultancy or updates that were not visible at the beginning.
With a clear and direct solution, we know what we are paying for and what we are getting, avoiding surprises and ensuring that the investment provides real value to the company.
One of the biggest challenges when changing solutions is data migration.
Many times, ESG information is scattered across spreadsheets, past reports, or systems that do not communicate with each other.
The challenge is not only to transfer that information, but also to clean and standardize it so that it becomes useful and comparable.
If we do not do it correctly, we end up with inconsistent data that complicates reporting and slows down decision-making.
Another critical point is the initial investment.
Launching a new solution requires dedicating time and money to configure it properly.
Here the key is to see it as a strategic investment, not as an expense.
What may seem like an extra effort today becomes tomorrow cost savings, greater efficiency, and smooth compliance.
There is no point in having a good solution if teams do not know how to use it.
Training and internal adoption are often one of the biggest bottlenecks in this type of transition.
We need all the involved departments to understand the value of the tool and integrate it into their daily routine.
The sooner the team adopts it, the sooner we will see the benefits in automation, reporting, and ESG management.
At Dcycle we are clear: we are not auditors or consultants, we are a solution for companies that need to simplify sustainability management and gain competitiveness in the market.
Our focus is on automation, clarity, and real usefulness of ESG data.
One of our differentials is that we centralize all ESG data in one place and distribute it in any format your company needs.
CSRD, EINF, Taxonomy, SBTi, ISOs… it does not matter which standard, you work once and use the information everywhere.
This prevents you from having to redo reports from scratch every time a new regulation appears.
With a single data flow, you save time and reduce errors, ensuring consistency across all communication.
We know that many solutions hide additional costs in consultancy, customization, or updates.
In our case, we offer total transparency from the beginning.
This way you can plan your investment with no surprises, with the certainty that what you pay is what you get.
Our platform is designed so that any team can use it easily.
Intuitive interface, automated processes, and clear workflows eliminate the manual burden of collecting and organizing ESG data.
This way, your teams stop wasting time on repetitive tasks and focus on what really matters: making strategic decisions.
Sustainability should not be a formality, it should be a competitive lever.
By working with reliable and comparable data, you can enter new markets, comply with regulations, and optimize internal processes.
With Dcycle, data stops being a headache and becomes a strategic tool that drives efficiency and competitiveness in your company.
The first thing is to be clear about which regulatory frameworks you need to cover.
Not all solutions respond equally to CSRD, EINF, SBTi, Taxonomy, or ISOs, so the key is to choose a platform that adapts information for multiple uses with a single data flow.
It is also important to pay attention to scalability.
Today you may need to comply with a specific regulation, but tomorrow you will have to report in several formats.
A good alternative should give you that flexibility from the start.
Alternatives offer greater automation, less dependence on manual processes, and better integration with internal systems.
This means time savings, cost reduction, and more control over ESG information.
In addition, many options come with clear and transparent pricing, avoiding the hidden costs that often appear in traditional models.
The key is to evaluate four aspects:
With these points, you can make a real comparison, beyond commercial promises.
The first step is data cleaning.
If records are incomplete or disorganized, the change will be more difficult.
It is also advisable to map which teams will use the new solution, in order to plan training from the start.
Finally, it is essential to define objectives: do we want to comply with regulations, optimize processes, reduce costs, or all at once?
Having this clear makes the transition easier and prevents migration from being left unfinished.
Because at Dcycle we are not auditors or consultants, we are a solution that centralizes ESG information and adapts it to any regulatory or strategic framework.
Our platform has clear pricing, is easy to use, and turns ESG data into a real competitive advantage.
We measure once and reuse that information in EINF, CSRD, SBTi, Taxonomy, or ISOs, without duplicating efforts or wasting time.
In a market where more and more companies measure their impact, with Dcycle sustainability stops being a formality and becomes a strategic lever to compete and grow.
Carbon footprint calculation analyzes all emissions generated throughout a product’s life cycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, usage, and disposal.
The most recognized methodologies are:
Digital tools like Dcycle simplify the process, providing accurate and actionable insights.
Some strategies require initial investment, but long-term benefits outweigh costs.
Investing in carbon reduction is not just an environmental action, it’s a smart business strategy.