How Novisto’s Cost is Structured
4 Factors That Determine Novisto’s Pricing
4 Reasons to Assess Whether Novisto Justifies the Investment
Current Trends in ESG Management and Their Impact on Costs
What No One Tells You About the Real Cost of These Platforms
Why Dcycle is the Comprehensive Alternative to Novisto
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Talking about Novisto’s pricing means entering a space where it becomes clear that it is neither a mass-market nor a low-cost solution.
Its cost starts at 40,000 CAD per year per user, although in practice it is always adapted according to the size of the company, the ESG modules required, and the regulations it must comply with.
The key here is not only the price, but what it implies.
We are dealing with a platform designed to centralize data, ensure traceability, guarantee audit-ready reports, and reduce as much as possible the manual processes that today make many teams lose both time and money.
More than an expense, we are talking about a strategic investment. If a company does not measure or organize its ESG data properly, sooner or later it will fall behind its competitors.
The matter is simple: if you don’t measure, you don’t compete.
With this in mind, let’s analyze in detail what these prices offer and which factors should be evaluated before making a decision.
Novisto’s cost is structured as an annual subscription, with a base price that can grow depending on the complexity of each case.
There are per-user license models and also module packages, depending on the needs of each organization.
The initial price usually includes main access, the central reporting platform, and a set of standard indicators to get started.
From there, extras come into play that make the difference in the final budget.
Among the most frequent additional costs we find advanced customization, integration with other internal systems, configuration of specific dashboards, and extended technical support.
These elements are often decisive for companies seeking a deeper level of control.
Before requesting a quote, it is advisable to prepare key information: the volume of ESG data to manage, the frequency of updates, the number of users that will need access, and the regulations we want to cover. The clearer we have this, the more realistic the proposal we receive will be.
The price changes depending on the amount of data and the level of detail and traceability required.
It is not the same to manage basic reports as to handle thousands of records with frequent updates.
Although the focus is on the platform, many times training services, different SLA levels, or even specialized support are added. All this increases the total cost.
The degree of automation in workflows, internal validations, and audit-ready reporting also matters.
The more automation, the higher the necessary investment.
The final cost is not the same for a local company as for a multinational operating in several countries.
The number of users, offices, and internal hierarchies determines much of the financial proposal.
In short, talking about Novisto pricing means understanding that there is no flat rate.
Each company receives an offer adapted to its organizational reality, regulatory requirements, and the depth of analysis it wants to achieve.
Novisto is a platform focused on ESG data management.
Its proposal revolves around centralizing information, automating calculations, and facilitating regulatory reporting under different international frameworks.
It is designed for companies that need exhaustive control of their indicators and that seek to give financial solidity to their sustainability narrative.
It is usually considered in cases where the priority is complying with regulatory reports, structuring sustainability metrics precisely, and managing information for both internal and external stakeholders.
Its focus is on ensuring traceability and data quality, rather than offering strategic guidance.
From its value proposition we can expect automation, structure, and data control.
What we should not expect is flexibility for multiple use cases beyond reporting or human support acting as a guide.
Its focus is to be an ESG information management system and not an all-in-one solution for all the sustainability processes of a company.
The price depends on how many regulatory frameworks and standards need to be covered.
We are talking about regulations such as CSRD, EU Taxonomy, EINF, SBTi, ISOs, or other standards each organization must follow.
The greater the regulatory complexity, the higher the investment.
Costs also vary depending on the number of users, departments, and international offices requiring access.
The level of permissions and roles to manage directly impacts the final price, since it is a solution oriented to large multidisciplinary teams.
The scope of reporting is another key factor.
It is not the same to work with a set of standard indicators as to configure advanced dashboards and specific metrics for each market.
The more customization, the higher the cost.
Finally, the level of integration with a company’s internal systems also influences.
If it is necessary to connect with ERP, procurement platforms, HR, data lakes, or BI solutions, the price increases as more complex technical configurations are required.
In summary, Novisto’s pricing is better understood when viewed in relation to these four factors.
It is not a catalog product, but a solution that scales depending on regulatory demands, the size of the organization, and the maturity of the ESG strategy.
In this context, companies also need to evaluate different sustainable finance frameworks that complement regulatory compliance and help align investment decisions with ESG strategies.
One of the main advantages is regulatory compliance.
With a system that centralizes information, it becomes easier to respond to frameworks like CSRD, Taxonomy, or ISOs, avoiding delays or errors in reporting.
The automation of reports and data traceability help reduce internal working hours.
This means that teams can dedicate less time to manual tasks and more to strategic decision-making.
With a platform of this type, duplications are eliminated and processes are optimized.
By having structured and reliable ESG data, operational costs associated with information gathering and validation drop significantly.
The regulatory environment changes constantly.
A system prepared to scale and adapt to new demands offers the certainty that the investment will not become obsolete in just a few years.
Novisto’s pricing is not always easy to compare with other solutions.
Each provider structures its pricing differently, which can complicate an objective evaluation.
In many cases, additional modules are included that are not always a priority.
If we are not clear about what we need, we may end up paying for functionalities that do not add real value to the business.
The initial price does not always reflect the total cost.
Integration with internal systems or advanced customization can raise the budget significantly if not considered from the beginning.
In short, analyzing Novisto’s pricing requires having clear needs, understanding what is included in the base cost, and anticipating the extras that will truly be necessary.
Only then can we decide if the investment aligns with our ESG strategy.
The speed with which regulations change is one of the main factors influencing costs.
Each new regulatory framework requires platform adjustments, which increase both license fees and initial configuration costs.
Today, it is not enough to have ESG data in an isolated system.
Companies demand integration with ERP, procurement, HR, and financial systems, and that interoperability usually requires custom developments that make the investment more expensive.
ESG reports are no longer just formal documents.
Full traceability and internal validation are required, which means more robust platforms with advanced controls and audit-ready workflows that naturally increase costs.
Companies are seeking to benchmark their results against industry peers.
This functionality requires more complex data models and, as a result, additional modules that raise the final price.
ESG reports are no longer just formal documents. Full traceability and internal validation are required, which means more robust platforms with advanced controls, audit-ready workflows, and precise measurement of the Carbon Footprint that naturally increase costs.
A frequent mistake is buying a solution thinking only about the immediate requirement.
If future evolution is not considered, the company may have to migrate platforms in a few years at a much higher cost.
Many companies purchase oversized packages that include unnecessary functionalities.
This happens when it has not been clearly defined which frameworks, indicators, and users will actually work with the tool.
The initial price may look reasonable, but integration with internal systems is often one of the most expensive items.
Not considering this in the initial negotiation leads to significant budget deviations.
An ESG platform is not static.
It requires constant updates, maintenance, and team training. If these evolution costs are not calculated, the real investment will be very different from what was expected.
Often, only the license cost is discussed, but what really matters are the extras: integrations, customization, and support.
If not considered from the beginning, the final invoice can double the initial budget.
A local team is not the same as a multinational with operations in different countries.
The number of users, permissions, and offices to manage makes the price multiply exponentially.
Some platforms require additional support to get started or to adapt to specific regulations.
This dependency on consultants does not always appear in the initial proposal but ends up being a fixed expense.
Regulations change, standards are updated, and the platform must keep pace.
This implies continuous updates that are not always included in the license and add an annual maintenance cost.
If we are just starting, we need a solution that helps us collect ESG data simply and structure it in a standard format.
Here, the most important aspects are ease of use and transparent pricing.
When we already have more experience, the next step is to automate processes and connect with internal systems.
At this stage, it is advisable to look for platforms that allow scaling without having to redo all the previous work.
At a more mature level, what we need is to extract strategic value from ESG data.
Not only reporting, but also comparing, analyzing trends, and aligning information with business goals and international frameworks.
At Dcycle, we position ourselves as a Solution for companies regardless of their level of maturity.
We collect all ESG data and distribute it across any regulatory framework or standard you need.
Our focus is clear: sustainability should be a strategic lever, not a bureaucratic burden.
The first step is to define which regulatory frameworks and KPIs we are going to cover.
It is not the same to work with a basic set of indicators as it is to cover CSRD, EU Taxonomy, or ISOs simultaneously.
Next, we must establish the number of users, teams, and roles that will have access.
This point is critical because the cost varies depending on how wide the organization is that will use the platform.
It is also advisable to identify the systems that require integration, such as ERP, finance, HR, or procurement.
This will allow us to anticipate technical adjustments and avoid surprises in the economic proposal.
Finally, we need to calculate the TCO (Total Cost of Ownership).
Here we must include not only licenses, but also support, implementation, and future evolution of the solution.
This way, we will be able to evaluate whether the total cost is aligned with the company’s strategic objectives.
At Dcycle, we collect all your ESG information and automatically adapt it to any framework you need.
We are talking about CSRD, EU Taxonomy, SBTi, ISOs, EINF, or any standard your company must comply with.
We are not auditors or consultants.
We are a Solution for companies that want to simplify ESG data management without depending on endless manual processes.
Our pricing is clear, transparent, and predictable.
We do not work with hidden figures or unexpected costs.
From the very beginning, you know what your subscription includes and how it adjusts to your company’s real needs.
This way, you can plan with confidence and without surprises.
The platform is designed to be comprehensive, avoiding tool fragmentation and reducing complexity.
With a single system you can save time, manage all ESG data in one place, and automate reports that would normally take weeks of work.
At Dcycle, we understand sustainability as a strategic lever.
We transform your ESG data into information that improves competitiveness, opens the door to new markets, and strengthens relationships with stakeholders.
In the end, it is not just about complying.
It is about using sustainability as a driver of growth.
The base price usually covers platform access and a limited set of standard indicators.
From there, extras such as additional modules, advanced customization, integrations with other systems, and specialized technical support are charged separately.
The number of users and teams directly impacts the budget.
More departments, international offices, or different roles mean higher license and permission costs.
This makes pricing very variable from one company to another.
It is advisable to have a clear list of regulatory frameworks and KPIs, the volume of ESG data, the update frequency, and the internal systems that require integration.
The more information we provide, the more realistic the proposal will be.
Comparison is not always straightforward because each provider structures prices differently.
The best practice is to evaluate the real scope of the included modules, the level of reporting automation, and the hidden costs of integration and support.
If what we want is clear and predictable pricing, at Dcycle we offer a Solution for companies that simplifies ESG management.
We collect all the information and distribute it automatically into any regulatory framework, avoiding cost surprises and reducing complexity.
Carbon footprint calculation analyzes all emissions generated throughout a product’s life cycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, usage, and disposal.
The most recognized methodologies are:
Digital tools like Dcycle simplify the process, providing accurate and actionable insights.
Some strategies require initial investment, but long-term benefits outweigh costs.
Investing in carbon reduction is not just an environmental action, it’s a smart business strategy.